Literature DB >> 9302141

Disease recurrence and progression in untreated pathologic stage T3 prostate cancer: selecting the patient for adjuvant therapy.

B A Lowe1, S F Lieberman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Optimal management of pathologic T3 prostate cancer is poorly defined. We conducted a prospective study of untreated pT3 patients to improve understanding of the natural history of this disease and to identify clinical parameters useful in patient selection for adjuvant therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 583 consecutive patients with clinical stage T1 to 2 disease managed by total prostatectomy, 206 had pT3 disease. Excluding patients requesting immediate adjuvant treatment or neoadjuvant therapy, 156 subjects were eligible for the study, including 34 with pT3a, 80 pT3b, 22 pT3c, and 20 pT3N+ disease. Patients were followed for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence of greater than 0.2 ng./ml. and biopsy proved local or distant tumor progression demonstrated by imaging studies.
RESULTS: After a median of 45 months, PSA recurrence was seen in 29.4% of pT3a (10/34), 30% of pT3b (24/80), 27.3% of pT3c (6/22), and 80% of pT3N+ (16/20 cases). Local or distant progression was seen in 2.9% of pT3a (1), 6.2% of pT3b (5), 9.1% of pT3c (2), and 55% of pT3N+ (11 cases). Recurrence and progression correlated with the number of surgical margins involved by tumor, pathological Gleason score and baseline pre-prostatectomy PSA levels. PSA recurrence was seen in 20.8% (10/48) patients with 1 surgical margin involved, 40.9% (9/22) with 2 margins involved and 50% (5/10) with 3 or more margins involved. PSA recurrence was 20.3% (14/69) with Gleason scores of less than 7, 33.9% (19/56) with a score of 7 and 74.2% (23/31) with scores of greater than 7. Pre-prostatectomy PSA levels less than 10 ng./ml. were associated with a PSA recurrence of 17.3% (14/81) and 45.4% (25/55), with levels greater than 10 ng./ml. Selecting patients for high or low risk based upon the results of these parameters allowed accurate prediction of PSA recurrence; 8.5% (4/47) for low risk patients and 44.8% (30/67) for high risk. Tumor progression was seen in no low risk patient and in 9% (6) with high risk. The difference between the 2 risk groups was highly significant (p <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with pT3 prostate cancer will not experience recurrent disease for many years if ever. Immediate use of adjuvant treatment should be reserved for those patients with a high risk of recurrent disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9302141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Risk stratification for biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins or extracapsular disease after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Jayakrishnan Jayachandran; Lionel L Bañez; Donna E Levy; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Christopher J Kane; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Concurrent chemoradiation for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin T Cooper; Nicholas J Sanfilippo
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-10

3.  Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy after Prostatectomy: ASTRO/AUA Guideline Amendment 2018-2019.

Authors:  Thomas M Pisansky; Ian M Thompson; Richard K Valicenti; Anthony V D'Amico; Shalini Selvarajah
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Transitioning from conformal radiotherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: Clinical benefit, oncologic outcomes and incidence of gastrointestinal and urinary toxicities.

Authors:  C H Flores-Balcázar; D M Urías-Arce; M T Bourlon; F Gabilondo-Navarro; S I Pérez-Álvarez; R Ramos-Prudencio; F Rodríguez-Covarrubias
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-05-21

5.  Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Diederik M Somford; Inge M van Oort; Jean-Pierre Cosyns; J Alfred Witjes; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Bertrand Tombal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Management of high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ariel E Marciscano; Matthew E Hardee; Nicholas Sanfilippo
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 8.  Current approaches, challenges and future directions for monitoring treatment response in prostate cancer.

Authors:  T J Wallace; T Torre; M Grob; J Yu; I Avital; Bldm Brücher; A Stojadinovic; Y G Man
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Age and Racial Differences among PSA-Detected (AJCC Stage T1cN0M0) Prostate Cancer in the U.S.: A Population-Based Study of 70,345 Men.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Edward M Messing; Lois B Travis; Ollivier Hyrien; Rui Chen; Michael T Milano; Yuhchyau Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changhao Chen; Tianxin Lin; Yu Zhou; Doudou Li; Kewei Xu; Zhihua Li; Xinxiang Fan; Guangzheng Zhong; Wang He; Xu Chen; Xianyin He; Jian Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.