Literature DB >> 9301440

Treatment decisions in palliative cancer care: patients' preferences for involvement and doctors' knowledge about it.

D Rothenbacher1, M P Lutz, F Porzsolt.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which hospitalised patients with advanced cancer and a palliative treatment goal wanted to be involved in the process of making treatment decisions and how well their physicians actually knew their preferences for participation. 59 hospitalised patients with non-curable cancer, 86 hospitalised patients with chronic non-neoplastic disease, and 115 non-hospitalised persons were surveyed with a standardised questionnaire. In addition, the physicians of the hospitalised patients were asked to complete a similar questionnaire. The majority of patients with advanced cancer wanted to decide either by themselves/mainly by themselves (9%) or to collaborate and decide together with their physician (73%), compared with 17% and 49%, respectively, of patients with chronic non-neoplastic disease, and 40% and 56%, respectively, of the non-hospitalised persons (difference between groups: P = 0.001). Younger age, higher education, employment and higher Karnofsky index were significantly associated with active involvement. The agreement of patients' preference with their physicians' assessment did not exceed chance. In conclusion, most patients wanted to participate in a decision regarding their treatment, although physicians were unaware of their patients' preferences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9301440     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00034-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  22 in total

1.  Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Alexandra L Barratt; Elizabeth Davey; Phyllis N Butow; Sally Redman; Nehmat Houssami; Glenn P Salkeld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Oncologists' assessments of lung cancer patient and family disagreements regarding treatment decision making.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Lindsey Dorflinger; Amma Agyemang; Sherman Baker; Maureen Wilson-Genderson
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Pamela J Atherton; Tenbroeck Smith; Thomas F Hack; Mashele M Huschka; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Brent Diekmann; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Decision-Making Preferences Among Older Hispanics Participating in a Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program.

Authors:  Jennifer C Molokwu; Eribeth Penaranda; Navkiran Shokar
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-10

5.  Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making.

Authors:  F E M Murtagh; A Thorns
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Health literacy, numeracy, and other characteristics associated with hospitalized patients' preferences for involvement in decision making.

Authors:  Kathryn M Goggins; Kenneth A Wallston; Samuel Nwosu; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Liana Castel; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014

7.  Desire for Information in the Elderly: Interactions with Patients, Family, and Physicians.

Authors:  Regina Gironés
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Measurement of self-advocacy in cancer patients and survivors.

Authors:  Carol J Hermansen-Kobulnicky
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Informed decision making in maternity care.

Authors:  Holly Goldberg
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2009

Review 10.  Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety.

Authors:  Yves Longtin; Hugo Sax; Lucian L Leape; Susan E Sheridan; Liam Donaldson; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.