Literature DB >> 9299651

Prediction of nasal obstruction based on clinical examination and acoustic rhinometry.

L F Grymer1, O Hilberg, O F Pedersen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find variables which characterize nasal obstruction. Scores from the clinical history, anterior rhinoscopy and objective values from acoustic rhinometry were found of importance. In a randomly-selected adult population of 230 individuals, 14% had the subjective feeling of nasal obstruction. The variables of significant value to predict nasal obstruction were: (1) symptoms of hypersensitivity/allergy and infection; (2) anterior septal deviations; and (3) small anterior dimensions of the nasal cavity. A minimum cross-sectional area (MCA) equal to 0.50 cm2, a cross-sectional area at the piriform aperture of 0.70 cm2 and a large effect of decongestion at MCA were found to be the best variables to separate obstructed from normal noses. Also, differences between each side of the nose were found of predictive value. In conclusion, a nose at risk for nasal obstruction is one with symptoms of allergy, frequent infections, small dimensions anteriorly, large difference between both sides, and a large degree of swelling of the mucosa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9299651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  12 in total

Review 1.  Nasal congestion and airway obstruction: the validity of available objective and subjective measures.

Authors:  Michael J Schumacher
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Nasal patency is related to dust exposure in woodworkers.

Authors:  V Schlünssen; I Schaumburg; N T Andersen; T Sigsgaard; O F Pedersen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  The role of sensation in subjective and objective evaluation of nasal patency.

Authors:  S Dipak; N Prepageran; Siti Haslinda; As Atiya; R Raman
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-13

4.  Is nasal cavity geometry associated with body mass index, height and weight?

Authors:  Md Tanveer Raza; De-Yun Wang
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-09-04

5.  Airflow Considerations and the Effect of Webster's Triangle in Reduction Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Haldun O Kamburoglu; Ozan Bitik; İbrahim Vargel
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Critical evaluation of different objective techniques of nasal airway assessment: a clinical review.

Authors:  P A R Clement; S Halewyck; F Gordts; O Michel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Acoustic rhinometry in persons recruited from the general population and diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis according to EPOS.

Authors:  B Lange; T Thilsing; J Baelum; O F Pedersen; R Holst; A Kjeldsen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions and resistance using acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in habitual snorers compared with non-snorers.

Authors:  Shahriar Yahyavi; Faezeh Mahdavi Parsa; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Neda Najimi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Atopy, symptoms and indoor environmental perceptions, tear film stability, nasal patency and lavage biomarkers in university staff.

Authors:  Jan Vilhelm Bakke; Gunilla Wieslander; Dan Norbäck; Bente E Moen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 10.  Acoustic rhinometry in mouth breathing patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Cardoso de Melo; Adriana de Oliveira de Camargo Gomes; Arlene Santos Cavalcanti; Hilton Justino da Silva
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.