Literature DB >> 22319710

The role of sensation in subjective and objective evaluation of nasal patency.

S Dipak1, N Prepageran, Siti Haslinda, As Atiya, R Raman.   

Abstract

To assess if sensation of nasal mucosa affect the subjective sensation of nasal patency. This is a case control study with 50 patients, using 2% lignocaine as the active drug and normal saline as the placebo (2 groups of 25 patients each). Each subject had 2 ml of solution sprayed into the test nose. These subjects had no prior nasal symptoms, allergy or surgery. They were evaluated subjectively using Likert scale and objectively by acoustic rhinometry before and after lignocaine or normal saline. The patients in both normal saline and lignocaine groups demonstrated no significant change based upon Likert scale. The study also demonstrated the mean cross sectional area 1 (CSA1), mean cross sectional area 2 (CSA2), with mean Volume 1 and mean Volume 2, these results did not vary significantly in both groups with Acoustic Rhinometry. The analysis thus shows that the use of topical anesthetic spray on nasal mucosa produces no objective effect on nasal resistance or subjective sensation of altered nasal patency. Thus the study concludes that, tactile sensation of nasal mucosa does not play a role in the sensation of nasal obstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nasal patency; Rhinometry; Sensation

Year:  2011        PMID: 22319710      PMCID: PMC3109966          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-010-0067-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  12 in total

1.  Clinical applications of acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  L F Grymer
Journal:  Rhinol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

2.  Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures.

Authors:  O Hilberg; O F Pedersen
Journal:  Rhinol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

3.  Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of the nasal cavity with septal deviations, before and after septoplasty.

Authors:  L F Grymer; O Hilberg; O Elbrønd; O F Pedersen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Acoustic rhinometry: do we need a standardized operating procedure?

Authors:  A Tomkinson; R Eccles
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1996-06

5.  Nasal sensation of airflow following blockade of the nasal trigeminal afferents.

Authors:  A S Jones; R G Wight; R Crosher; L H Durham
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1989-08

6.  Prediction of nasal obstruction based on clinical examination and acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  L F Grymer; O Hilberg; O F Pedersen
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  The effects of nasal anaesthesia upon nasal sensation of airflow.

Authors:  R Eccles; S Morris; N S Tolley
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  The effect of submucosal diathermy to the inferior turbinates on nasal resistance to airflow in allergic and vasomotor rhinitis.

Authors:  A S Jones; J M Lancer; A A Moir; J C Stevens
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1985-10

9.  Acoustic rhinometry used as a method to monitor the effect of intramuscular injection of steroid in the treatment of nasal polyps.

Authors:  O Elbrønd; J U Felding; K M Gustavsen
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.469

10.  The effect of menthol on nasal resistance to air flow.

Authors:  R Eccles; A S Jones
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.469

View more
  2 in total

1.  Objective assessment of persistent rhinitis in Chinese and its relationship with serum indicators.

Authors:  Ke-Jia Cheng; Shen-Qing Wang; Shan Lin; Shui-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The expansion of autologous adipose-derived stem cells in vitro for the functional reconstruction of nasal mucosal tissue.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Liang Li; Cheng Wang; Yang Liu; Chong Chen; Junling Yan; Hong Ding; Su-Yang Tang
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 7.133

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.