Literature DB >> 33598741

Airflow Considerations and the Effect of Webster's Triangle in Reduction Rhinoplasty.

Haldun O Kamburoglu1, Ozan Bitik2, İbrahim Vargel3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduction rhinoplasties, regardless of the methods used (structural or preservation), can cause a reduction in the internal nasal volume, which may lead to breathing problems. In 1977, Webster proposed preserving a little triangle in the beginning of the lower lateral osteotomy line to prevent breathing problem. However, its importance is still controversial.
OBJECTIVES: and methods: This prospective randomized controlled study (level of evidence 1) included 46 patients without nasal breathing problem. High-to-low (Webster's triangle preservation) osteotomy (control group, n = 23) and low-to-low osteotomy (study group, n = 23) were performed. All operations were performed according to the proposed volumetric rhinoplasty steps (examination/measurement, prevention and treatment). Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) test, visual analog scale, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), and three-dimensional measurements were performed in all patients. Breathing tests were repeated before and 6 months after surgery with and without xylometazoline administration.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in NOSE and visual analog scale scores was found between the two groups. Acoustic rhinometry, PNIF, and rhinomanometry findings showed no statistically significant breathing difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In reduction rhinoplasties, a decrease in the internal volume may be expected as directly proportional with the reduction amount. The decrease in the internal volume may create nasal breathing problems. To prevent it, nasal airflow should be adjusted according to new anatomy. In this study, we discussed "volumetric rhinoplasty" steps to prevent breathing problems in reduction rhinoplasty. Following these steps, not preserving Webster's triangle (low-to-low osteotomy) has no effect on the nasal airway. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nasal airway; Nasal breathing; Nasal osteotomy; Reduction rhinoplasty; Rhinoplasty; Septum; Turbinate

Year:  2021        PMID: 33598741     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02168-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  48 in total

1.  Influence of lateral osteotomies in the dimensions of the nasal cavity.

Authors:  L F Grymer; C Gregers-Petersen; H Baymler Pedersen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Nasal obstruction following septorhinoplasty: how well does acoustic rhinometry work?

Authors:  Deniz Tuna Edizer; Ferhat Erisir; Yalcin Alimoglu; Seher Gokce
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The effect of changes in ambient temperature on the reliability of acoustic rhinometry data.

Authors:  A Tomkinson; R Eccles
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Curved lateral osteotomy for airway protection in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  R C Webster; T M Davidson; R C Smith
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1977-08

5.  Evaluation of nasal airway alterations associated with septorhinoplasty by both objective and subjective methods.

Authors:  Murat Erdogan; Cemal Cingi; Erdal Seren; Hamdi Cakli; M Kezban Gürbüz; Ercan Kaya; Armagan Incesulu; Erkan Ozudogru; Cem Kecik
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Does rhinoplasty reduce nasal patency?

Authors:  Saban Celebi; Erdem Caglar; Baki Yilmaz; Omer Develioglu; Murat Topak; Halim Is; Mehmet Kulekci
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Natural History of Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale following Functional Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Cherian K Kandathil; Sami P Moubayed; Chayada Chanasriyotin; Sam P Most
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 1.446

8.  Nasal osteotomy and airway changes.

Authors:  B Guyuron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Subjective and objective improvement in breathing after rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Richard A Zoumalan; Minas Constantinides
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2012-11

10.  Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in the cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  L F Grymer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.