BACKGROUND: Direct renal angiography is still the method of choice for identification of renal artery stenosis. Newer non-invasive diagnostic methods include color coded duplex sonography and also ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring, since in a large proportion of patients with secondary forms of hypertension the usual blood pressure fall during nighttime disappears. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective in-hospital study we investigated 86 patients with suspected renovascular hypertension. Circadian blood pressure was measured oscillometrically and color coded duplex sonography was performed immediately before direct renal angiography. RESULTS: Angiography revealed renal artery stenosis (> or = 50%) in 42 patients. This compared to a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 91.7% for the use of sonography in those patients (70.4%) who could be adequately examined. Mean 24-h pressure values as well as standard deviations of blood pressure means as an indicator for blood pressure variability were not different in the 2 groups of patients, when all the data were analysed together and also when the data for nighttime and daytime were examined separately. The percent of blood pressure fall during nighttime was also not different in the 2 groups. In both groups 4 hypertensive patients had a blood pressure increase during nighttime. In 11 patients without renal artery stenosis a blood pressure fall of < 10% was observed, compared to 12 patients with renal artery stenosis. The circadian pattern of pulse rate was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has a considerably lower diagnostic value for renal artery stenosis compared to angiography and also to color duplex sonography. This method therefore does not appear to be an appropriate screening approach for this kind of secondary hypertension. The color coded duplex sonography, however, seems to be the best non-invasive diagnostic method in those patients, who can be adequately examined.
BACKGROUND: Direct renal angiography is still the method of choice for identification of renal artery stenosis. Newer non-invasive diagnostic methods include color coded duplex sonography and also ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring, since in a large proportion of patients with secondary forms of hypertension the usual blood pressure fall during nighttime disappears. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective in-hospital study we investigated 86 patients with suspected renovascular hypertension. Circadian blood pressure was measured oscillometrically and color coded duplex sonography was performed immediately before direct renal angiography. RESULTS: Angiography revealed renal artery stenosis (> or = 50%) in 42 patients. This compared to a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 91.7% for the use of sonography in those patients (70.4%) who could be adequately examined. Mean 24-h pressure values as well as standard deviations of blood pressure means as an indicator for blood pressure variability were not different in the 2 groups of patients, when all the data were analysed together and also when the data for nighttime and daytime were examined separately. The percent of blood pressure fall during nighttime was also not different in the 2 groups. In both groups 4 hypertensivepatients had a blood pressure increase during nighttime. In 11 patients without renal artery stenosis a blood pressure fall of < 10% was observed, compared to 12 patients with renal artery stenosis. The circadian pattern of pulse rate was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has a considerably lower diagnostic value for renal artery stenosis compared to angiography and also to color duplex sonography. This method therefore does not appear to be an appropriate screening approach for this kind of secondary hypertension. The color coded duplex sonography, however, seems to be the best non-invasive diagnostic method in those patients, who can be adequately examined.
Authors: P Verdecchia; G Schillaci; M Guerrieri; C Gatteschi; G Benemio; F Boldrini; C Porcellati Journal: Circulation Date: 1990-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: F B Muller; J E Sealey; D B Case; S A Atlas; T G Pickering; M S Pecker; J J Preibisz; J H Laragh Journal: Am J Med Date: 1986-04 Impact factor: 4.965