Literature DB >> 9293519

Subjective depth-of-focus of the eye.

D A Atchison1, W N Charman, R L Woods.   

Abstract

An experiment is described in which the subjective depth-of-focus (DOF) of the eye, defined as the range of focusing errors for which the image of the target appears to have the same clarity, contrast, and form as the optimal in-focus image, was measured as a function of the size of high contrast (99%) Snellen Es for 5 trained subjects under cycloplegia. Mean DOF increased by approximately 60% as the size of the letter detail increased from -0.2 to 0.87 log min arc (Snellen equivalent: 6/3.8 to 6/45), although there were considerable intersubject variations. DOF declined with increasing pupil diameter, the mean total DOFs being 0.86, 0.59, and 0.55 D for 2-, 4-, and 6-mm pupils, respectively. In a second experiment, use of low (21%) contrast letters with a 4-mm pupil and 4 subjects marginally increased the DOF (by 0.08 +/- 0.05 D); refraction also shifted in a myopic direction by a mean of 0.15 +/- 0.06 D compared with the high contrast letters. A third experiment with four less-experienced subjects demonstrated the importance of instruction and training in any measurement involving judgment of just-perceptible defocus blur. The clinical implications of the results for measurements of refraction and amplitude of accommodation are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9293519     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199707000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  23 in total

1.  Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jit B Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  The clinical depth of field achievable with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations and proof of concept clinical results.

Authors:  Ante Barišić; Sudi Patel; Nikica Gabric; Claes G Feinbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-González; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.

Authors:  Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; Emily Aslakson; Andrew Kornaus; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Impact of primary spherical aberration, spatial frequency and Stiles Crawford apodization on wavefront determined refractive error: a computational study.

Authors:  Renfeng Xu; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The effect of phenylephrine on the ciliary muscle and accommodation.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Melissa D Bailey; Loraine T Sinnott; Chiu-Yen Kao; Karla Zadnik; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  The effects of phenylephrine on pupil diameter and accommodation in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Minus lens stimulated accommodative lag as a function of age.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Adrian Glasser; Karla K Stuebing; Ruth E Manny
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Retinal image quality during accommodation.

Authors:  Norberto López-Gil; Jesson Martin; Tao Liu; Arthur Bradley; David Díaz-Muñoz; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Minimum change in spherical aberration that can be perceived.

Authors:  Silvestre Manzanera; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.