Literature DB >> 9293010

Effect of aerosolization on culturability and viability of gram-negative bacteria.

J F Heidelberg1, M Shahamat, M Levin, I Rahman, G Stelma, C Grim, R R Colwell.   

Abstract

Estimations of the bacterial content of air can be more easily made now than a decade ago, with colony formation the method of choice for enumeration of airborne bacteria. However, plate counts are subject to error because bacteria exposed to the air may remain viable yet lose the ability to form colonies, i.e., they become viable but nonculturable. If airborne bacteria exhibit this phenomenon, colony formation data will significantly underestimate the bacterial populations in air samples. The objective of the study reported here was to determine the effect of aerosolization on viability and colony-forming ability of Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella planticola, and Cytophaga allerginae. A collision nebulizer was used to spray bacterial suspensions into an aerosol chamber, after which duplicate samples were collected in all-glass impingers over a 4-h period. Humidity was maintained at ca. 20 to 25%, and temperature was maintained at 20 to 22 degrees C for each of two replicate trials per microorganism. Viability was determined by using a modified direct viable count method, employing nalidixic acid or aztreonam and p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (INT). Cells were stained with acridine orange and observed by epifluorescence microscopy to enumerate total and viable cells. Viable cells were defined as those elongating in the presence of antibiotic and/or reducing INT. CFU were determined by plating on tryptic soy agar and R2A agar. It was found that culture techniques did not provide an adequate description of the bacterial burdens of indoor air (i.e., less than 10% of the aerosolized bacteria were capable of forming visible colonies). It is concluded that total cell count procedures provide a better approximation of the number of bacterial cells in air and that procedures other than plate counting are needed to enumerate bacteria in aerosol samples, especially if the public health quality of indoor air is to be estimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9293010      PMCID: PMC168664          DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.9.3585-3588.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine.

Authors:  P S Thorne; M S Kiekhaefer; P Whitten; K J Donham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A tentative direct microscopic method for counting living marine bacteria.

Authors:  K Kogure; U Simidu; N Taga
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  J E Hobbie; R J Daley; S Jasper
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Use of solid-phase PCR for enhanced detection of airborne microorganisms.

Authors:  A J Alvarez; M P Buttner; G A Toranzos; E A Dvorsky; A Toro; T B Heikes; L E Mertikas-Pifer; L D Stetzenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparison of methods for quantitative determinations of airborne bacteria and evaluation of total viable counts.

Authors:  I M Lundholm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Selective media in air sampling: a review.

Authors:  D Kingston
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1971-03

7.  Use of a fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring bacteria.

Authors:  G G Rodriguez; D Phipps; K Ishiguro; H F Ridgway
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Factors affecting the selection and use of tetrazolium salts as cytochemical indicators of microbial viability and activity.

Authors:  S M Thom; R W Horobin; E Seidler; M R Barer
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1993-04

9.  The effect of varying levels of outdoor-air supply on the symptoms of sick building syndrome.

Authors:  R Menzies; R Tamblyn; J P Farant; J Hanley; F Nunes; R Tamblyn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Effect of temperature on survival of Legionella pneumophila in the aquatic environment.

Authors:  C Paszko-Kolva; M Shahamat; R R Colwell
Journal:  Microb Releases       Date:  1993-09
View more
  27 in total

1.  Airborne microbial flora in a cattle feedlot.

Authors:  S C Wilson; J Morrow-Tesch; D C Straus; J D Cooley; W C Wong; F M Mitlöhner; J J McGlone
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Climate factors influencing bacterial count in background air samples.

Authors:  Roy M Harrison; Alan M Jones; Peter D E Biggins; Nigel Pomeroy; Christopher S Cox; Stephen P Kidd; Jon L Hobman; Nigel L Brown; Alan Beswick
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Impact of relative humidity and collection media on mycobacteriophage D29 aerosol.

Authors:  Keyang Liu; Zhanbo Wen; Na Li; Wenhui Yang; Jie Wang; Lingfei Hu; Xiaokai Dong; Jianchun Lu; Jinsong Li
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Air ionisation and colonisation/infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter species in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Kevin G Kerr; Clive B Beggs; Stephen G Dean; Judith Thornton; Judith K Donnelly; Neil J Todd; P Andrew Sleigh; Andleeb Qureshi; Charles C Taylor
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Measurement of ice nucleation-active bacteria on plants and in precipitation by quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Thomas C J Hill; Bruce F Moffett; Paul J Demott; Dimitrios G Georgakopoulos; William L Stump; Gary D Franc
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  The effect of environmental parameters on the survival of airborne infectious agents.

Authors:  Julian W Tang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Accuracy, precision, and method detection limits of quantitative PCR for airborne bacteria and fungi.

Authors:  Denina Hospodsky; Naomichi Yamamoto; Jordan Peccia
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Detection of human-induced environmental disturbances in a show cave.

Authors:  Angel Fernandez-Cortes; Soledad Cuezva; Sergio Sanchez-Moral; Juan Carlos Cañaveras; Estefania Porca; Valme Jurado; Pedro Maria Martin-Sanchez; Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Release of free DNA by membrane-impaired bacterial aerosols due to aerosolization and air sampling.

Authors:  Huajun Zhen; Taewon Han; Donna E Fennell; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Induction and resuscitation of viable but nonculturable Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium DT104.

Authors:  A R Gupte; C L E De Rezende; S W Joseph
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.