Literature DB >> 8563271

Using belief networks to enhance sharing of medical knowledge between sites with variations in data accuracy.

W R Hogan1, M M Wagner.   

Abstract

Differences in data definition between sites are a known obstacle to sharing of reminder-system rule sets. We identify another data characteristic--data accuracy--with implications for sharing. We reviewed the literature on data accuracy and found reports of high error rates for many data classes used by reminder systems (e.g., problem lists). The accuracy of other, equally important, data classes had not been characterized. Wide variations in accuracy between sites has been observed, suggesting that such differences may pose a previously unrecognized barrier to sharing of reminder rules. We propose a belief-network model for encoding reminder rules that explicitly models site-specific data accuracy and we discuss how encoding knowledge in this format may lower the cost and effort required to share reminder rules between sites.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8563271      PMCID: PMC2579087     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care        ISSN: 0195-4210


  18 in total

1.  The quality of gastroenterological reports based on free text dictation: an evaluation in endoscopy and ultrasonography.

Authors:  K Kuhn; W Swobodnik; R S Johannes; T Zemmler; E F Stange; H Ditschuneit; M Classen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Development of an immunization tracking system in a large health maintenance organization. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound.

Authors:  T Payne; S Kanvik; R Seward; D Beeman; A Salazar; Z Miller; V Immanuel; R S Thompson
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1991

3.  Physician and coding errors in patient records.

Authors:  S S Lloyd; J P Rissing
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Use and abuse of performance indicators.

Authors:  P W Skinner; D Riley; E M Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-12

5.  Quality of hospital data and DRGs.

Authors:  I H Aas
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1988

6.  The misinformation era: the fall of the medical record.

Authors:  J F Burnum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Formal error rate in a computerized obstetric medical record.

Authors:  F Jelovsek; W Hammond
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database.

Authors:  J L Barrie; D R Marsh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-18

9.  Data quality and quality control of a population-based cancer registry. Experience in Finland.

Authors:  L Teppo; E Pukkala; M Lehtonen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  A user-oriented validation method for clinical data.

Authors:  N G Rao; B E Prasad; S K Guha; P G Reddy
Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)       Date:  1986 Oct-Dec
View more
  3 in total

1.  Representing CARE rules in a decision-theoretic formalism.

Authors:  M M Wagner; J M Overhage; E Rodriguez; G F Cooper
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

Review 2.  Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.

Authors:  W R Hogan; M M Wagner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Factors impacting physician use of information charted by others.

Authors:  Meredith N Zozus; Melody Penning; William E Hammond
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2018-12-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.