Literature DB >> 1737162

Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database.

J L Barrie1, D R Marsh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the completeness and accuracy of data in a computerised clinical information system (Manchester orthopaedic database) in comparison with the data available through the Hospital Activity Analysis.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of case notes, computer data, and Hospital Activity Analysis data.
SETTING: Orthopaedic unit in a district general hospital in Manchester.
SUBJECTS: 200 random patient records distributed through the period of use of the computer system (1 October 1988 to 31 March 1990) and 121 records for random admissions between 1 April 1989 and 31 March 1990, 71 of which were included in the previous sample. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Conformity of the computer record key words and Hospital Activity Analysis codes to an ideal key word record and ideal code record drawn up by one investigator from the clinical notes; overall quality (completeness times accuracy).
RESULTS: Overall completeness of the data in the orthopaedic database was 62% and the accuracy was 96%. Completeness improved after feedback to doctors on the use of key words in regular audit meetings. Completeness was higher in inpatient than outpatient records (69.9% v 53.7%, p less than 0.001) and when a new key word was required compared with missing and incorrect key words (both p less than 0.001). Completeness was lower when the key word was required of a senior registrar (p less than 0.05). Accuracy was not significantly different. The completeness of Hospital Activity Analysis data was 90.5% and accuracy 69.5%. Thus the overall data quality was similar in both systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in a system designed for simple and efficient data capture, compliance by users was poor. Accuracy was high, suggesting that users understood the principles of data entry. Completeness of data capture can be improved by providing feedback to users on use of the system and performance. Improvements in future versions of the software should improve performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1737162      PMCID: PMC1881150          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6820.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  13 in total

1.  Prevalence of vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  S H Ralston; G D Urquhart; M Brzeski; R D Sturrock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-03

2.  The application of a computer data base system to the generation of hospital discharge summaries.

Authors:  R P Smith; G B Holzman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Accuracy of hospital activity analysis operation codes.

Authors:  P D Whates; A R Birzgalis; M Irving
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-06-19

4.  Accuracy of hospital activity analysis data in estimating the incidence of proximal femoral fracture.

Authors:  J L Rees
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-06-19

5.  Inaccurate coding corrupts medical information.

Authors:  R Sunderland
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Can you measure performance?

Authors:  J M Yates; M G Davidge
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-06-23

7.  The human element in the design of computer-assisted orthopedic inpatient medical record systems.

Authors:  S D Kuslich; C M Peck
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  A patient registry for orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  D A Brand; M H Krag; M R Hausman; K F Trainor; E Akelman; S A Rudicel; W O Southwick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Audit of a surgical firm by microcomputer: five years' experience.

Authors:  D C Dunn
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-05

10.  Development of a microcomputer-based system for surgical audit and patient administration: a review.

Authors:  B W Ellis; H R Michie; S T Esufali; R J Pyper; H A Dudley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework.

Authors:  Danielle G T Arts; Nicolette F De Keizer; Gert-Jan Scheffer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Comparative hospital databases: value for management and quality.

Authors:  R Cleary; R Beard; J Coles; B Devlin; A Hopkins; D Schumacher; I Wickings
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

3.  Routine data: a resource for clinical audit?

Authors:  M McKee
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

4.  Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database.

Authors:  Mohammed Garout; Henry S Tilney; Paris P Tekkis; Paul Aylin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A 5 to 8 year follow-up study of the Rotaglide mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alastair Hudd; Kumar Kunasingam; David Ricketts; John Bush
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  A novel method for the assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic codes in general surgery.

Authors:  N Gibson; S A Bridgman
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Evaluation of postoperative complications following elective surgeries of dogs and cats at private practices using computer records.

Authors:  F L Pollari; B N Bonnett
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 8.  Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.

Authors:  W R Hogan; M M Wagner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Recognising and dealing with complications in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  D Ricketts; R A Rogers; T Roper; X Ge
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Registration in the Danish Regional Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database: completeness of registration and accuracy of key variables.

Authors:  Anna L Lamberg; Deirdre Cronin-Fenton; Anne B Olesen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.