Literature DB >> 9290448

The Preterm Prediction Study: association of cesarean delivery with increases in maternal weight and body mass index.

B C Brost1, R L Goldenberg, B M Mercer, J D Iams, P J Meis, A H Moawad, R B Newman, M Miodovnik, S N Caritis, G R Thurnau, S F Bottoms, A Das, D McNellis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate whether maternal weight and body mass index measured either before or during pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: Maternal weight and height were prospectively collected on 2929 women in the National Institutes of Health Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Preterm Prediction Study. Prepregnancy and 27- to 31-week maternal weight and height were used to calculate the body mass index, and its contribution to the risk of cesarean delivery was determined. Women with prenatally diagnosed congenital anomalies (n = 89) and pregestational diabetes (n = 31) were excluded from analysis.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis of risk factors for cesarean delivery in the 2809 eligible women revealed a decreased risk of cesarean delivery with maternal age < 18 years and multiparity; increased risk of cesarean delivery was noted with maternal age > 35 years and a male fetus. Increases in either prepregnancy or 27- to 31-week maternal weight (5-pound units) or body mass index (1.0 kg/m2 units) were significantly associated with an increased odds of cesarean delivery (p = 0.0001). Each unit increase in prepregnancy or 27- to 31-week body mass index resulted in a parallel increase in the odds of cesarean delivery of 7.0% and 7.8%, respectively. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis confirmed the association of male fetus, age, nulliparity, and body mass index as significant variables contributing to cesarean delivery risk.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of cesarean delivery is associated with incremental changes in maternal weight and body mass index before and during pregnancy after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Prepregnancy counseling about optimizing maternal weight and monitoring weight gain during pregnancy to decrease the risk of cesarean delivery are supported by this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9290448     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70195-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  18 in total

1.  Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Rosenberg; Samantha Garbers; Heather Lipkind; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route.

Authors:  Michelle A Kominiarek; Paul Vanveldhuisen; Judith Hibbard; Helain Landy; Shoshana Haberman; Lee Learman; Isabelle Wilkins; Jennifer Bailit; Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Victor Hugo Gonzalez-Quintero; Kimberly Gregory; Christos Hatjis; Matthew Hoffman; Mildred Ramirez; Uma M Reddy; James Troendle; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Super obesity in pregnancy: difficulties in clinical management.

Authors:  A Martin; I Krishna; J Ellis; R Paccione; M Badell
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Does body mass index of infertile women have an impact on IVF procedure and outcome?

Authors:  C Wittemer; J Ohl; M Bailly; K Bettahar-Lebugle; I Nisand
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Labor length among overweight and obese women undergoing induction of labor.

Authors:  Adi Hirshberg; Lisa D Levine; Sindhu Srinivas
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-02-03

6.  Body mass index has a greater impact on pregnancy outcomes than gestational hyperglycaemia.

Authors:  W Ricart; J López; J Mozas; A Pericot; M A Sancho; N González; M Balsells; R Luna; A Cortázar; P Navarro; O Ramírez; B Flández; L F Pallardo; A Hernández-Mijas; J Ampudia; J M Fernández-Real; R Corcoy
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Population-based assessment of the risk of primary cesarean delivery due to excess prepregnancy weight among nulliparous women delivering term infants.

Authors:  Patricia M Dietz; William M Callaghan; Brian Morrow; Mary E Cogswell
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-09

8.  Obstetric and non-obstetric risk factors for cesarean section in oman.

Authors:  Ibrahim Al Busaidi; Yahya Al-Farsi; Shyam Ganguly; Vaidyanathan Gowri
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2012-11

9.  Implications of the Institute of Medicine weight gain recommendations for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes in black and white women.

Authors:  L E Caulfield; R J Stoltzfus; F R Witter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Maternal anthropometric factors and risk of primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  M J Shepard; A F Saftlas; L Leo-Summers; M B Bracken
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.