Literature DB >> 24392860

Labor length among overweight and obese women undergoing induction of labor.

Adi Hirshberg1, Lisa D Levine, Sindhu Srinivas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Maternal weight is thought to impact labor. With rising rates of obesity and inductions, we sought to evaluate labor times among induced women by body mass index (BMI) category.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of term inductions from 2005 to 2010. BMI categories were: normal weight (NW), overweight (OW), and obese (Ob) (18.5-24.9, 25-29.9, ≥30 kg/m(2)). Kruskal-Wallis tests compared median latent labor (LL) length and active labor (AL) length. Chi-square determined associations. Multivariable logistic regression controlled for confounders. Analyses were stratified by parity.
RESULTS: A total of 448 inductions were analyzed. For nulliparas, there was no difference in LL by BMI category (p = 0.22). However, OW nulliparas had a longer AL compared to NW and Ob nulliparas (3.2, 1.7, 2.0 h, p = 0.005). For multiparas, NW had the shortest LL (5.5 h, p = 0.025) with no difference in AL among BMI categories (p = 0.42). The overall cesarean rate was 23% with no difference by BMI category (p = 0.95). However, Ob women had a greater percentage of first stage cesareans (41%) and NW had a greater percentage of second stage cesareans (55%), p = 0.06.
CONCLUSION: The association between BMI and labor length among inductions differs by phase of labor and parity. BMI also influences the stage of labor in which a cesarean occurs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; induction of labor; labor curves; labor length; obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24392860      PMCID: PMC5485899          DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.879705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  25 in total

1.  Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Helain J Landy; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Shoshana Haberman; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Judith U Hibbard; Matthew K Hoffman; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Paul Van Veldhuisen; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The Preterm Prediction Study: association of cesarean delivery with increases in maternal weight and body mass index.

Authors:  B C Brost; R L Goldenberg; B M Mercer; J D Iams; P J Meis; A H Moawad; R B Newman; M Miodovnik; S N Caritis; G R Thurnau; S F Bottoms; A Das; D McNellis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Risk of first-stage and second-stage cesarean delivery by maternal body mass index among nulliparous women in labor at term.

Authors:  Elaine M Fyfe; Ngaire H Anderson; Robyn A North; Eliza H Y Chan; Rennae S Taylor; Gustaaf A Dekker; Lesley M E McCowan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Transition from latent to active labor.

Authors:  D B Peisner; M G Rosen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The influence of obesity and diabetes on the risk of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Hugh M Ehrenberg; Celeste P Durnwald; Patrick Catalano; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Intrauterine pressure during the second stage of labor in obese women.

Authors:  Catalin S Buhimschi; Irina A Buhimschi; Andrew M Malinow; Carl P Weiner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Marie I Cedergren
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Normal progress of induced labor.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Aaron B Caughey; Anthony O Odibo; Kimberly A Roehl; Qiuhong Zhao; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Term induction of labor and subsequent preterm birth.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Hillary R Bogner; Adi Hirshberg; Michal A Elovitz; Mary D Sammel; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  Preventing Cesarean Birth in Women with Obesity: Influence of Unit-Level Midwifery Presence on Use of Cesarean among Women in the Consortium on Safe Labor Data Set.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Rachel Breman; Jeremy L Neal; Julia C Phillippi
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert versus Cervical Ripening Balloon for Term Induction of Labor in Obese Nulliparas-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Roy Lauterbach; Dikla Ben Zvi; Haneen Dabaja; Ragda Zidan; Naphtali Justman; Dana Vitner; Ron Beloosesky; Nadir Ghanem; Yuval Ginsberg; Yaniv Zipori; Zeev Weiner; Nizar Khatib
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Impact of physical activity during pregnancy on obstetric outcomes in obese women.

Authors:  Rachel A Tinius; Alison G Cahill; W Todd Cade
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.637

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.