Literature DB >> 9288410

Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans.

J Kekoni1, H Hämäläinen, M Saarinen, J Gröhn, K Reinikainen, A Lehtokoski, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

In the first experiment, somatosensory event-related potentials (SERPs) were recorded to tactile pulses and vibration bursts applied to the left middle finger in trains of 4-8 stimuli with 1 s intervals. In addition to the negative N140 deflection, also the positive P50, P100 and P300 waves attenuated in amplitude with stimulus repetition. These decreases were immediate, there being no marked further amplitude attenuation after the second stimulus. The locus of this rate effect appears not to be the primary SI or SII, but rather prefrontal cortices or some deeper structures. In the second experiment, vibratory stimuli of different frequencies or at different skin sites were presented using the oddball paradigm. When the deviant stimulus was a high-frequency vibration burst, it elicited a distinct N250 deflection, probably analogous to the auditory N2b. When the deviation was a change in the stimulation site, no N250 deflection but instead an extra negativity between 100-200 ms latency, probably analogous to the auditory mismatch negativity, was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9288410     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(97)05249-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  32 in total

1.  Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Yoshiaki Nishihira; Arihiro Hatta; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Masanori Sakamoto; Tsuyoshi Nakajima
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Active attention modulates passive attention-related neural responses to sudden somatosensory input against a silent background.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of stimulus frequency and duration on somatosensory discrimination responses.

Authors:  L A Spackman; S G Boyd; A Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of stimulus probability on the somatosensory mismatch field.

Authors:  Kosuke Akatsuka; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Tetsuo Kida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Bi-directional modulation of somatosensory mismatch negativity with transcranial direct current stimulation: an event related potential study.

Authors:  Jui-Cheng Chen; Dorothea Hämmerer; Kevin D'Ostilio; Elias P Casula; Louise Marshall; Chon-Haw Tsai; John C Rothwell; Mark J Edwards
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Somatosensory off-response in humans: an ERP study.

Authors:  Koya Yamashiro; Koji Inui; Naofumi Otsuru; Tetsuo Kida; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Functional features of crossmodal mismatch responses.

Authors:  Chen Zhao; Elia Valentini; Li Hu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Short-term plasticity as a neural mechanism supporting memory and attentional functions.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; Mark L Andermann; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The approach of visual stimuli influences expectations about stimulus types for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kimura; Jun'ichi Katayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neural surprise in somatosensory Bayesian learning.

Authors:  Sam Gijsen; Miro Grundei; Robert T Lange; Dirk Ostwald; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.