Literature DB >> 12736841

Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time.

Tetsuo Kida1, Yoshiaki Nishihira, Arihiro Hatta, Toshiaki Wasaka, Hiroki Nakata, Masanori Sakamoto, Tsuyoshi Nakajima.   

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP) and the variation of reaction time (RT). For this purpose, we recorded the ERPs (N250 and P300) in fast- and slow-reaction trials during a somatosensory discrimination task. Strong, standard, and weak target electrical stimuli were randomly delivered to the left median nerve at the wrist with a random interstimulus interval (900-1,100 ms). All the subjects were instructed to respond by pressing a button with their right thumb as fast as possible whenever a target stimulus was presented. We divided all the trials into fast- and slow-RT trials and averaged the data. N250 latency tended to be delayed when the RT was slow, but not significantly. P300 latency was delayed significantly when the RT was slow, but to a much lesser extent than the RT delay, so we concluded that the change of RT was not fully determined by the processes reflected by the somatosensory N250 or P300. Furthermore, the larger and earlier P300 in the fast-RT trials implied that when larger amounts of attentional resources were allocated to a given task, the speed of stimulus evaluation somewhat increased and RT was shortened to a great extent. N250 amplitude did not significantly vary in the two RT clusters. In conclusion, the somatosensory N250 reflects active target detection, which is relatively independent of the modulation of the response speed, whereas the somatosensory P300 could change without manipulation of either the stimulus or the response processing demand.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12736841     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0801-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  33 in total

1.  Cortico-muscular synchronization during isometric muscle contraction in humans as revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  J Gross; P A Tass; S Salenius; R Hari; H J Freund; A Schnitzler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Somatosensory event-related potentials following different stimulus conditions.

Authors:  J Ito; H Shibasaki; J Kimura
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.292

Review 3.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; B L Day; S Boyd; C D Marsden
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  Target side and scalp topography of the somatosensory P300.

Authors:  P Bruyant; L García-Larrea; F Mauguière
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec

5.  Movement-induced depression of soleus H reflexes is consistent in humans over the range of excitatory afferents involved.

Authors:  J E Misiaszek; J Cheng; J D Brooke
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1995-12-08       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Movement-induced gain modulation of somatosensory potentials and soleus H-reflexes evoked from the leg. I. Kinaesthetic task demands.

Authors:  W R Staines; J D Brooke; J Cheng; J E Misiaszek; W A MacKay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans.

Authors:  J Kekoni; H Hämäläinen; M Saarinen; J Gröhn; K Reinikainen; A Lehtokoski; R Näätänen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1997-08-22       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources.

Authors:  C Wickens; A Kramer; L Vanasse; E Donchin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Facilitation of H-reflex by homonymous Ia-afferent fibers in man.

Authors:  Y Fukushima; N Yamashita; Y Shimada
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Intracranial ERPs in humans during a lateralized visual oddball task: II. Temporal, parietal, and frontal recordings.

Authors:  J M Clarke; E Halgren; P Chauvel
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  5 in total

1.  Active attention modulates passive attention-related neural responses to sudden somatosensory input against a silent background.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Medial prefrontal theta bursts precede rapid motor responses during visual selective attention.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Marissa Westerfield; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spontaneous Fluctuations in Sensory Processing Predict Within-Subject Reaction Time Variability.

Authors:  Maria J Ribeiro; Joana S Paiva; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Altered somatosensory evoked potentials associated with improved reaction time in a simple sensorimotor response task following repetitive practice.

Authors:  Mayu Akaiwa; Koki Iwata; Hidekazu Saito; Takeshi Sasaki; Kazuhiro Sugawara
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  The Effect of Pedaling at Different Cadence on Attentional Resources.

Authors:  Mayu Akaiwa; Koki Iwata; Hidekazu Saito; Eriko Shibata; Takeshi Sasaki; Kazuhiro Sugawara
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.