Literature DB >> 25398556

Functional features of crossmodal mismatch responses.

Chen Zhao1, Elia Valentini, Li Hu.   

Abstract

Research on brain mechanisms of deviance detection and sensory memory trace formation, best indexed by the mismatch negativity, mainly relied on the investigation of responses elicited by auditory stimuli. However, comparable less research reported the mismatch negativity elicited by somatosensory stimuli. More importantly, little is known on the functional features of mismatch deviant and standard responses across different sensory modalities. To directly compare different sensory modalities, we adopted a crossmodal roving paradigm and collected event-related potentials elicited by auditory, non-nociceptive somatosensory, and nociceptive trains of stimuli, during Active and Passive attentional conditions. We applied a topographical segmentation analysis to cluster successive scalp topographies with quasi-stable landscape of significant differences to extract crossmodal mismatch responses. We obtained three main findings. First, across different sensory modalities and attentional conditions, the formation of a standard sensory trace became robust mainly after the second stimulus repetition. Second, the neural representation of a modality deviant stimulus was influenced by the preceding sensory modality. Third, the mismatch negativity significantly covaried between Active and Passive attentional conditions within the same sensory modality, but not between different sensory modalities. These findings provide robust evidence that, while different modalities share a similar process of standard trace formation, the process of deviance detection is largely modality dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25398556     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4141-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  56 in total

1.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain.

Authors:  E T Bullmore; J Suckling; S Overmeyer; S Rabe-Hesketh; E Taylor; M J Brammer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans.

Authors:  J Kekoni; H Hämäläinen; M Saarinen; J Gröhn; K Reinikainen; A Lehtokoski; R Näätänen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1997-08-22       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential.

Authors:  I Winkler; G Karmos; R Näätänen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

5.  Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120-to-N140 transition.

Authors:  L García-Larrea; A C Lukaszewicz; F Mauguière
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Parallel activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortices in human pain processing.

Authors:  M Ploner; F Schmitz; H J Freund; A Schnitzler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Common or redundant neural circuits for duration processing across audition and touch.

Authors:  John S Butler; Sophie Molholm; Ian C Fiebelkorn; Manuel R Mercier; Theodore H Schwartz; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pain facilitates tactile processing in human somatosensory cortices.

Authors:  Markus Ploner; Bettina Pollok; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; Giorgio Bonmassar; Anders M Dale; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Sari Levänen; Fa-Hsuan Lin; Patrick May; Jennifer Melcher; Steven Stufflebeam; Hannu Tiitinen; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Only low frequency event-related EEG activity is compromised in multiple sclerosis: insights from an independent component clustering analysis.

Authors:  Hanni Kiiski; Richard B Reilly; Róisín Lonergan; Siobhán Kelly; Marie Claire O'Brien; Katie Kinsella; Jessica Bramham; Teresa Burke; Seán O Donnchadha; Hugh Nolan; Michael Hutchinson; Niall Tubridy; Robert Whelan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cardio-audio synchronization drives neural surprise response.

Authors:  Christian Pfeiffer; Marzia De Lucia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Expectation violation and attention to pain jointly modulate neural gain in somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Francesca Fardo; Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Micah Allen; Martin J Dietz; Andreas Roepstorff; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Magnetoencephalography Responses to Unpredictable and Predictable Rare Somatosensory Stimuli in Healthy Adult Humans.

Authors:  Qianru Xu; Chaoxiong Ye; Jarmo A Hämäläinen; Elisa M Ruohonen; Xueqiao Li; Piia Astikainen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The Influence of Expectation on Nondeceptive Placebo and Nocebo Effects.

Authors:  Hua Wei; Lili Zhou; Huijuan Zhang; Jie Chen; Xuejing Lu; Li Hu
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma.

Authors:  Christian Pfeiffer; Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo Nguissi; Magali Chytiris; Phanie Bidlingmeyer; Matthias Haenggi; Rebekka Kurmann; Frédéric Zubler; Ettore Accolla; Dragana Viceic; Marco Rusca; Mauro Oddo; Andrea O Rossetti; Marzia De Lucia
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 4.511

6.  Brain regions preferentially responding to transient and iso-intense painful or tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Q Su; W Qin; Q Q Yang; C S Yu; T Y Qian; A Mouraux; G D Iannetti; M Liang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 6.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.