Literature DB >> 10628991

A chromosome-based model for estimating the number of conserved segments between pairs of species from comparative genetic maps.

D Waddington1, A J Springbett, D W Burt.   

Abstract

Comparative genetic maps of two species allow insights into the rearrangements of their genomes since divergence from a common ancestor. When the map details the positions of genes (or any set of orthologous DNA sequences) on chromosomes, syntenic blocks of one or more genes may be identified and used, with appropriate models, to estimate the number of chromosomal segments with conserved content conserved between species. We propose a model for the distribution of the lengths of unobserved segments on each chromosome that allows for widely differing chromosome lengths. The model uses as data either the counts of genes in a syntenic block or the distance between extreme members of a block, or both. The parameters of the proposed segment length distribution, estimated by maximum likelihood, give predictions of the number of conserved segments per chromosome. The model is applied to data from two comparative maps for the chicken, one with human and one with mouse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10628991      PMCID: PMC1460923     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  18 in total

1.  Parameters of the human genome.

Authors:  N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  [Interval estimates of combinatorial measures of similarity for orders of homologous genes].

Authors:  I A Zakharov; V S Nikiforov; E V Stepaniuk
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  1995-08

3.  Comparative genome organization of vertebrates. The First International Workshop on Comparative Genome Organization.

Authors:  L Andersson; A Archibald; M Ashburner; S Audun; W Barendse; J Bitgood; C Bottema; T Broad; S Brown; D Burt; C Charlier; N Copeland; S Davis; M Davisson; J Edwards; A Eggen; G Elgar; J T Eppig; I Franklin; P Grewe; T Gill; J A Graves; R Hawken; J Hetzel; J Womack
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 4.  [Micro vs. macro: structural-functional organization of avian micro- and macrochromosomes].

Authors:  A V Rodionov
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  1996-05

Review 5.  A Macintosh program for storage and analysis of experimental genetic mapping data.

Authors:  K F Manly
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 6.  Bovine genome mapping: evolutionary inference and the power of comparative genomics.

Authors:  J E Womack; S R Kata
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Gene homologs on human chromosome 15q21-q26 and a chicken microchromosome identify a new conserved segment.

Authors:  C T Jones; D R Morrice; I R Paton; D W Burt
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Synteny conservation and chromosome rearrangements during mammalian evolution.

Authors:  J Ehrlich; D Sankoff; J H Nadeau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Comparative genomics: lessons from cats.

Authors:  S J O'Brien; J Wienberg; L A Lyons
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 10.  Chicken genome mapping: a new era in avian genetics.

Authors:  D W Burt; N Bumstead; J J Bitgood; F A Ponce de Leon; L B Crittenden
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  6 in total

1.  Determination of the number of conserved chromosomal segments between species.

Authors:  S Kumar; S R Gadagkar; A Filipski; X Gu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A BAC-based physical map of the chicken genome.

Authors:  Chengwei Ren; Mi-Kyung Lee; Bo Yan; Kejiao Ding; Bettye Cox; Michael N Romanov; Jennifer A Price; Jerry B Dodgson; Hong-Bin Zhang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Measures of synteny conservation between species pairs.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ann Housworth; John Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Chromosomal mapping of Brassica oleracea based on ESTs from Arabidopsis thaliana: complexity of the comparative map.

Authors:  D Babula; M Kaczmarek; A Barakat; M Delseny; C F Quiros; J Sadowski
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  LineUp: statistical detection of chromosomal homology with application to plant comparative genomics.

Authors:  Steve Hampson; Aoife McLysaght; Brandon Gaut; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution.

Authors:  Pavel Pevzner; Glenn Tesler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.