Literature DB >> 9284489

Basic emotions evoked by odorants: comparison between autonomic responses and self-evaluation.

O Alaoui-Ismaïli1, O Robin, H Rada, A Dittmar, E Vernet-Maury.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to analyze the relationship between self-report and physiological expression of basic emotions (happiness, surprise, fear, sadness, disgust and anger) in response to odorants. 44 subjects inhaled five odorants: vanillin, menthol, eugenol, methyl methacrylate, and propionic acid. Six autonomic nervous systems (ANS) parameters were simultaneously recorded in real time and without interference: Skin Potential (SP), Skin Resistance (SR), Skin Temperature (ST), Skin Blood Flow (SBF), Instantaneous Respiratory Frequency (IRF) and Instantaneous Heart Rate (IHR). At the end of the recording, subjects were instructed i) to identify the odorants roughly II) to situate them on an 11-point hedonic scale from highly pleasant (0) to highly unpleasant (10); and iii) to define what type of basic emotion was evoked by each odorant. In this study, the expected affects were aroused in the subjects. Vanillin and menthol were rated pleasant, while methyl methacrylate and propionic acid were judged unpleasant. Eugenol was median in hedonic estimation. ANS evaluation (each autonomic pattern induced by an odorant was transcripted into a basic emotion) shows that pleasantly connoted odorants evoked mainly happiness and surprise, but that unpleasant ones induced mainly disgust and anger. Eugenol was associated with positive and negative affects. Comparison between conscious (verbal) and unconscious (ANS) emotions, reveals that these two estimations 1) were not significantly different as far as the two pleasant odorants were concerned, 2) showed a tendency to be significantly different for eugenol odorant which was variably scored on the hedonic axis, and 3) exhibited a significant difference for the two unpleasant odorants, for which the corresponding "verbal emotion" was mainly "disgust", while the most frequent ANS emotion was "anger". In conclusion, these results show quite a good correlation between verbal and ANS estimated basic emotions. The main difference concerns anger: while there is a high occurrence of this emotion revealed by the analysis of ANS responses, it does not appear to be easily expressed through the verbal channel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9284489     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)90016-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  20 in total

1.  The role of perceived pollution and health risk perception in annoyance and health symptoms: a population-based study of odorous air pollution.

Authors:  Anna-Sara Claeson; Edvard Lidén; Maria Nordin; Steven Nordin
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Pupillary responses to intranasal trigeminal and olfactory stimulation.

Authors:  Christine B Schneider; Tjalf Ziemssen; Benno Schuster; Han-Seok Seo; Antje Haehner; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Reward deficits in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia include insensitivity to negative stimuli.

Authors:  David C Perry; Samir Datta; Virginia E Sturm; Kristie A Wood; Jessica Zakrzewski; William W Seeley; Bruce L Miller; Joel H Kramer; Howard J Rosen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Controlled human exposure to methyl tertiary butyl ether in gasoline: symptoms, psychophysiologic and neurobehavioral responses of self-reported sensitive persons.

Authors:  N Fiedler; K Kelly-McNeil; S Mohr; P Lehrer; R E Opiekun; C Lee; T Wainman; R Hamer; C Weisel; R Edelberg; P J Lioy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  The sensory channel of presentation alters subjective ratings and autonomic responses toward disgusting stimuli-Blood pressure, heart rate and skin conductance in response to visual, auditory, haptic and olfactory presented disgusting stimuli.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Kerstin Laqua; Frank Süß; Peter Joraschky; Tjalf Ziemssen; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Do ambient urban odors evoke basic emotions?

Authors:  Sandra T Glass; Elisabeth Lingg; Eva Heuberger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-23

7.  Self-Regulation of Anterior Insula with Real-Time fMRI and Its Behavioral Effects in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Korhan Buyukturkoglu; Hans Roettgers; Jens Sommer; Mohit Rana; Leonie Dietzsch; Ezgi Belkis Arikan; Ralf Veit; Rahim Malekshahi; Tilo Kircher; Niels Birbaumer; Ranganatha Sitaram; Sergio Ruiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hedonic appreciation and verbal description of pleasant and unpleasant odors in untrained, trainee cooks, flavorists, and perfumers.

Authors:  Caroline Sezille; Arnaud Fournel; Catherine Rouby; Fanny Rinck; Moustafa Bensafi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-24

9.  A pleasant familiar odor influences perceived stress and peripheral nervous system activity during normal aging.

Authors:  Pauline Joussain; Catherine Rouby; Moustafa Bensafi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-17

10.  A unique memory process modulated by emotion underpins successful odor recognition and episodic retrieval in humans.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Saive; Jean-Pierre Royet; Nadine Ravel; Marc Thévenet; Samuel Garcia; Jane Plailly
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.