Literature DB >> 19484181

Pupillary responses to intranasal trigeminal and olfactory stimulation.

Christine B Schneider1, Tjalf Ziemssen, Benno Schuster, Han-Seok Seo, Antje Haehner, Thomas Hummel.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether pupillary responses to odorous stimuli reflect their intensity or hedonic tone. A total of 21 healthy subjects participated in the study. Using a computer-controlled olfactometer, subjects received intranasal stimuli including odors of rose (PEA; 2 concentrations), lemon and rotten eggs, plus the trigeminal irritant CO2 (also at two concentrations). Changes in the pupil diameter were obtained ipsilaterally to the side of stimulus presentation. Both trigeminal and olfactory stimulation produced an increase in pupillary diameter. Latencies for pupillary reaction were fastest for the higher concentration of CO2 and slowest after the presentation of PEA at the low concentration. Response amplitudes were largest in response to stimulation with CO2 at the high concentration, while they were smallest in response to odorous stimulation with PEA. Response latencies decreased with increasing stimulus intensity. No such correlation was found for hedonic ratings and pupillary reactions. Thus, the change in the pupillary diameter indicates differences between stimulus modalities and stimulus strength, but not pleasantness or unpleasantness of the odors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19484181     DOI: 10.1007/s00702-009-0244-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)        ISSN: 0300-9564            Impact factor:   3.575


  25 in total

1.  Autonomic nervous system responses to odours: the role of pleasantness and arousal.

Authors:  M Bensafi; C Rouby; V Farget; B Bertrand; M Vigouroux; A Holley
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Laura Miccoli; Miguel A Escrig; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  [Significance of pupillometry in otorhinolaryngology].

Authors:  H Nishida
Journal:  Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho       Date:  1971-12

4.  Basic emotions evoked by odorants: comparison between autonomic responses and self-evaluation.

Authors:  O Alaoui-Ismaïli; O Robin; H Rada; A Dittmar; E Vernet-Maury
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-10

5.  Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation.

Authors:  G Kobal
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Pupillometry in clinical psychophysiological diagnostics: methodology and proposals for application in psychiatry.

Authors:  J Grünberger; L Linzmayer; M Grünberger; B Saletu
Journal:  Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 0.481

7.  Olfactory influences on mood and autonomic, endocrine, and immune function.

Authors:  Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser; Jennifer E Graham; William B Malarkey; Kyle Porter; Stanley Lemeshow; Ronald Glaser
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.905

8.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the miotic effects of dihydrocodeine in humans.

Authors:  Helmut Schmidt; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Electrocortical and autonomic alteration by administration of a pleasant and an unpleasant odor.

Authors:  P Brauchli; P B Rüegg; F Etzweiler; H Zeier
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  [The perception of an odogen is proportional to the activity of the autonomous nervous system in man].

Authors:  Iu V Uryvaev; Iu P Zverev
Journal:  Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.437

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome and the PHOX2B gene: a model of respiratory and autonomic dysregulation.

Authors:  Pallavi P Patwari; Michael S Carroll; Casey M Rand; Rajesh Kumar; Ronald Harper; Debra E Weese-Mayer
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.931

2.  Cortical modulation of pupillary function: systematic review.

Authors:  Costanza Peinkhofer; Daniel Kondziella; Gitte M Knudsen; Rita Moretti
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.