OBJECTIVES: Health effects associated with air pollution at exposure levels below toxicity may not be directly related to level of exposure, but rather mediated by perception of the air pollution and by top-down processing (e.g., beliefs that the exposure is hazardous). The aim of the study was to test a model that describes interrelations between odorous air pollution at non-toxic exposure levels, perceived pollution, health risk perception, annoyance and health symptoms. METHODS: A population-based questionnaire study was conducted in a Swedish community of residents living near a biofuel facility that emitted odorous substances. Individuals aged 18-75 years were selected at random for participation (n = 1,118); 722 (65 %) agreed to participate. Path analyses were performed to test the validity of the model. RESULTS: The data support a model proposing that exposure level does not directly influence annoyance and symptoms, and that these relations instead are mediated by perceived pollution and health risk perception. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived pollution and health risk perception play important roles in understanding and predicting environmentally induced annoyance and health symptoms in odorous environments at non-toxic levels of exposure.
OBJECTIVES: Health effects associated with air pollution at exposure levels below toxicity may not be directly related to level of exposure, but rather mediated by perception of the air pollution and by top-down processing (e.g., beliefs that the exposure is hazardous). The aim of the study was to test a model that describes interrelations between odorous air pollution at non-toxic exposure levels, perceived pollution, health risk perception, annoyance and health symptoms. METHODS: A population-based questionnaire study was conducted in a Swedish community of residents living near a biofuel facility that emitted odorous substances. Individuals aged 18-75 years were selected at random for participation (n = 1,118); 722 (65 %) agreed to participate. Path analyses were performed to test the validity of the model. RESULTS: The data support a model proposing that exposure level does not directly influence annoyance and symptoms, and that these relations instead are mediated by perceived pollution and health risk perception. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived pollution and health risk perception play important roles in understanding and predicting environmentally induced annoyance and health symptoms in odorous environments at non-toxic levels of exposure.
Authors: C E Dunn; S P Kingham; B Rowlingson; R S Bhopal; S Cockings; C J Foy; S D Acquilla; J Halpin; P Diggle; D Walker Journal: Health Place Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: D Boers; L Geelen; H Erbrink; L A M Smit; D Heederik; M Hooiveld; C J Yzermans; M Huijbregts; I M Wouters Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2015-10-11 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Hans Orru; Henrik Olstrup; Annika Hagenbjörk; Steven Nordin; Kati Orru Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Victoria Blanes-Vidal; Jesper Bælum; Joel Schwartz; Per Løfstrøm; Lars P Christensen Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Ana Fernández-Somoano; Sabrina Llop; Inmaculada Aguilera; Ibon Tamayo-Uria; María Dolores Martínez; Maria Foraster; Ferran Ballester; Adonina Tardón Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 3.390