Literature DB >> 9276701

Local excision of rectal cancer.

R Bleday1.   

Abstract

The prospect of treating a rectal cancer often leads to significant fear among patients because of the possibility of a permanent colostomy. Although radical resection, in particular abdominoperineal resection, has been used effectively for rectal cancer treatment, other techniques such as local excision with or without adjuvant therapy have been used with significantly less morbidity than that of the abdominoperineal resection, with excellent cure rates. There are essentially three local excision techniques that can be used to remove a small rectal cancer completely. Selection criteria are critical for choosing the appropriate patient for these techniques. Tumors must be less than 4 cm in diameter and take up less than 40% of the rectal wall circumference. They also need to be relatively close to the dentate line and have no evidence of any invasion into the mesorectum or perirectal nodes. Preoperative staging with endorectal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and digital examination helps select appropriate patients. Retrospective series have shown significant success using local excision techniques, with local recurrence rates ranging from 0% to 11% for early-stage lesions. Prospective series have shown similar recurrence rates. Postoperative function with or without adjuvant therapy has not been adequately documented along with quality of life and must be part of any future reports on local excision techniques as well as all rectal cancer treatment studies. Local excision does, however, seem to provide adequate treatment in well selected patients and provides a less morbid alternative to the treatment of rectal cancer than radical resection, particularly abdominoperineal resection, which obligates the patient to a permanent colostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9276701     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  Significance of defect closure following transanal local full-thickness excision of rectal malignant tumors.

Authors:  Shingo Noura; Masayuki Ohue; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Masayoshi Yasui
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-04

Review 2.  Should the rectal defect be closed following transanal local excision of rectal tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Menahem; A Alves; R Morello; J Lubrano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  A comparison of transanal excision and endoscopic resection for early rectal cancer.

Authors:  Soon Hak Lee; Seong Woo Jeon; Min Kyu Jung; Sung Kook Kim; Gyu Seog Choi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-10-15

4.  Surveillance Intensity Comparison by Risk for T1NX Locally Excised Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a Cost-Effective Analysis.

Authors:  Mason McCain; Yohanis O'Neill; Hernan Hernandez; Ryan Foley; Brian M Sadowski; Zachary Torgersen; Jennifer Beaty; Ruben Rojas Payacan; Charles A Ternent
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery?

Authors:  David J Bentrem; Satoshi Okabe; W Douglas Wong; Jose G Guillem; Martin R Weiser; Larissa K Temple; Leah S Ben-Porat; Bruce D Minsky; Alfred M Cohen; Philip B Paty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Long-term oncologic results of patients with distal rectal cancer treated by local excision with or without adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Byung Soh Min; Nam Kyu Kim; Yong Taek Ko; Kang Young Lee; Seung Hyuk Baek; Chang Hwan Cho; Seung Kook Sohn
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Long-Term Outcomes and Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients Receiving Radical Surgery for Pathological T1 Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Daichi Kitaguchi; Takeshi Sasaki; Yuji Nishizawa; Yuichiro Tsukada; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Evolving treatment strategies for colorectal cancer: a critical review of current therapeutic options.

Authors:  Daniel C Damin; Anderson R Lazzaron
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Is the increasing rate of local excision for stage I rectal cancer in the United States justified?: a nationwide cohort study from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Y Nancy You; Nancy N Baxter; Andrew Stewart; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Long-term results of local excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash; Paul Baron; Maureen Zakowski; Bruce D Minsky; David Blumberg; Daniel R Nathanson; Jose G Guillem; Warren E Enker; Alfred M Cohen; W Douglas Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.