Literature DB >> 30353404

Long-Term Outcomes and Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients Receiving Radical Surgery for Pathological T1 Lower Rectal Cancer.

Daichi Kitaguchi1, Takeshi Sasaki2, Yuji Nishizawa1, Yuichiro Tsukada1, Masaaki Ito3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few reports have evaluated the long-term outcomes of pathological T1 (pT1) lower rectal cancer (LRC), perhaps because pT1 LRC is classified as TNM stage I if lymph node metastasis (LNM) is absent and stage IIIA if LNM is present. Moreover, it is difficult to diagnose regional LNM preoperatively. This study aimed to clarify the long-term outcomes of radical surgery for pT1 LRC and risk factor(s) for LNM. Additionally, we examined whether preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were predictive of LNM in pT1 LRC.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics, short-term operative outcomes, and long-term survival rates of 155 patients who received radical surgery and were diagnosed with pT1 LRC at our hospital between January 1993 and February 2017.
RESULTS: Among patients with pT1 LRC, 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 94.0% and 95.8%, respectively. LNM status was not associated with statistically significant differences in recurrence-free or overall survival. Even in patients with LNM, the recurrence rate was only 9%. Among patients who lacked visible mesorectal lymph nodes on preoperative CT and MRI, LNM rates were 3.5% and 4.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes after radical surgery for pT1 LRC are satisfactory or good, regardless of the presence or absence of LNM. In patients with pT1 LRC, the absence of visible mesorectal lymph nodes on preoperative CT and MRI is associated with a reduced likelihood of LNM and has a high negative predictive value for LNM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30353404     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4824-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  38 in total

1.  Sphincter-sparing treatment for distal rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  G D Steele; J E Herndon; R Bleday; A Russell; A Benson; M Hussain; A Burgess; J E Tepper; R J Mayer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Local excision of rectal carcinoma: a safe alternative for more advanced tumors?

Authors:  R A Graham; A W Hackford; D E Wazer
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Local excision of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  M G Varma; S J Rogers; T R Schrock; M L Welton
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-08

4.  Is local excision adequate therapy for early rectal cancer?

Authors:  A Mellgren; P Sirivongs; D A Rothenberger; R D Madoff; J García-Aguilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Local excision of rectal cancer without adjuvant therapy: a word of caution.

Authors:  J Garcia-Aguilar; A Mellgren; P Sirivongs; D Buie; R D Madoff; D A Rothenberger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Anal sphincter conservation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum: long-term results of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 89-02.

Authors:  A H Russell; J Harris; P J Rosenberg; W T Sause; B J Fisher; J P Hoffman; W G Kraybill; R W Byhardt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Long-term follow-up of patients with rectal cancer managed by local excision with and without adjuvant irradiation.

Authors:  A Chakravarti; C C Compton; P C Shellito; W C Wood; J Landry; S R Machuta; D Kaufman; M Ancukiewicz; C G Willett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Evaluation of local excision for sessile-type lower rectal tumors.

Authors:  Y Ishizaki; Y Takeda; T Miyahara; T Tokutome
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

Review 9.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Kwok; I P Bissett; G L Hill
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison.

Authors:  Gina Brown; Catherine J Richards; Michael W Bourne; Robert G Newcombe; Andrew G Radcliffe; Nicholas S Dallimore; Geraint T Williams
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current Status of the Management of Stage I Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Craig Howard Olson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Tumor Location as a Prognostic Factor in T1 Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Katsuro Ichimasa; Shin-Ei Kudo; Yuta Kouyama; Kenichi Mochizuki; Yuki Takashina; Masashi Misawa; Yuichi Mori; Takemasa Hayashi; Kunihiko Wakamura; Hideyuki Miyachi
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2022-01-28

3.  Establishment of a Dynamic Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Stage Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zitao Liu; Chao Huang; Huakai Tian; Yu Liu; Yongshan Huang; Zhengming Zhu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.