Literature DB >> 21160652

A comparison of transanal excision and endoscopic resection for early rectal cancer.

Soon Hak Lee1, Seong Woo Jeon, Min Kyu Jung, Sung Kook Kim, Gyu Seog Choi.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the outcomes of endoscopic resection with transanal excision in patients with early rectal cancer.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with early rectal cancer were treated by transanal excision or endoscopic resection between May 1999 and December 2007. The patients were regularly re-examined by means of colonoscopy and abdominal computed tomography after resection of the early rectal cancer. Complications, length of hospital-stay, disease recurrence and follow up outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated by endoscopic resection and 16 patients were treated by transanal excision. No significant differences were present in the baseline characteristics. The rate of complete resection in the endoscopic resection group was 93.8%, compared to 87.5% in the transanal excision group (P = 0.544). The mean length of hospital-stay in the endoscopic resection group was 2.7 ± 1.1 d, compared to 8.9 ± 2.7 d in the transanal excision group (P = 0.001). The median follow up was 15.0 mo (range 6-99). During the follow up period, there was no case of recurrent disease in either group.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic resection was a safe and effective method for the treatment of early rectal cancers and its outcomes were comparable to those of transanal excision procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic resection; Rectal cancer; Transanal excision

Year:  2009        PMID: 21160652      PMCID: PMC2999074          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v1.i1.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  27 in total

Review 1.  Local excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  R Bleday
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A prospective evaluation of high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy in predicting completeness of EMR.

Authors:  David P Hurlstone; Simon S Cross; Steven Brown; David S Sanders; Alan J Lobo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  S Maslekar; S H Pillinger; J R T Monson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Peter A Cataldo
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: local recurrence rate following resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  P A Whitehouse; J N Armitage; H S Tilney; J N L Simson
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses.

Authors:  Jesse S Moore; Peter A Cataldo; Turner Osler; Neil H Hyman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Transanal excision for low rectal cancers is curative in early-stage disease with favorable histology.

Authors:  S Blair; J D Ellenhorn
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK.

Authors:  B J Rembacken; T Fujii; A Cairns; M F Dixon; S Yoshida; D M Chalmers; A T Axon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Local therapy for rectal cancer: still controversial?

Authors:  F Bretagnol; E Rullier; B George; B F Warren; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in rectal adenomas: experience of six Italian centres.

Authors:  M Guerrieri; M Baldarelli; M Morino; M Trompetto; A Da Rold; I Selmi; M E Allaix; G Lezoche; E Lezoche
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 4.088

View more
  2 in total

1.  Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS) with utilization of a next-generation single-port system: a cadaveric feasibility study.

Authors:  J Marks; S Ng; T Mak
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Approach to rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Terence C Chua; Chanel H Chong; Winston Liauw; David L Morris
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-06-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.