Literature DB >> 9276411

Detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in fecal samples by PCR.

S Satake1, N Clark, D Rimland, F S Nolte, F C Tenover.   

Abstract

Surveillance cultures for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are time-consuming and expensive for the laboratory to perform. Therefore, we investigated the use of PCR as an alternative method of detecting and identifying VRE directly in fecal samples. PCR primers directed to vanA, vanB, vanC1, vanC2, and enterococcal ligase genes were used to detect and identify VRE in fecal material obtained by rectal or perirectal swabbing. Although PCR-inhibitory substances were present in DNA prepared directly from the swabs, the inhibitory substances could be reduced by processing the nucleic acid with two commercially available DNA preparation columns. Fecal material from 333 swabs was cultured on several selective agar media before and after broth enrichment. DNA was extracted from the fecal material and was analyzed by PCR. By using all four primer sets, only 59 (67.8%) of the samples were positive for vanA. However, after retesting the negative samples with only the vanA primer set, 77 (88.5%) of 87 specimens that were culture positive for Enterococcus faecium containing vanA were positive by PCR. One specimen was PCR positive for the vanA gene but culture negative for enterococci. The specificity of the vanA assay was 99.6%. PCR analysis of enrichment broth samples with all four primers sets after 15 to 18 h of incubation detected 74 (85.1%) of the 87 culture-positive specimens. The specificity of the vanA assay after the enrichment step was 100%. No vanB-containing enterococci were recovered by culture. Since 16 samples can be tested by PCR in 4 h (including electrophoresis), identification of VRE is possible within 8 h of specimen submission at a cost of approximately $10.12/assay. Thus, PCR may be a cost-effective alternative to culture for surveillance of VRE in some hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9276411      PMCID: PMC229963          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.35.9.2325-2330.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  24 in total

Review 1.  An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  T G Emori; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Rapid detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  S C Edberg; C J Hardalo; C Kontnick; S Campbell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Emergence of high-level resistance to glycopeptides in Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus casseliflavus.

Authors:  S Dutka-Malen; B Blaimont; G Wauters; P Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Nosocomial outbreak due to Enterococcus faecium highly resistant to vancomycin, penicillin, and gentamicin.

Authors:  S Handwerger; B Raucher; D Altarac; J Monka; S Marchione; K V Singh; B E Murray; J Wolff; B Walters
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Outbreak of vancomycin-, ampicillin-, and aminoglycoside-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia in an adult oncology unit.

Authors:  M A Montecalvo; H Horowitz; C Gedris; C Carbonaro; F C Tenover; A Issah; P Cook; G P Wormser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Conjugal transfer of the vancomycin resistance determinant vanB between enterococci involves the movement of large genetic elements from chromosome to chromosome.

Authors:  R Quintiliani; P Courvalin
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  F C Tenover; J Tokars; J Swenson; S Paul; K Spitalny; W Jarvis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Development of a standardized screening method for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  J M Swenson; N C Clark; M J Ferraro; D F Sahm; G Doern; M A Pfaller; L B Reller; M P Weinstein; R J Zabransky; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Characterization of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci from U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  N C Clark; R C Cooksey; B C Hill; J M Swenson; F C Tenover
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Analysis of genes encoding D-alanine-D-alanine ligase-related enzymes in Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus flavescens.

Authors:  F Navarro; P Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  32 in total

1.  Development of a PCR assay for rapid detection of enterococci.

Authors:  D Ke; F J Picard; F Martineau; C Ménard; P H Roy; M Ouellette; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Simple and reliable multiplex PCR assay for surveillance isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  R Kariyama; R Mitsuhata; J W Chow; D B Clewell; H Kumon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  A C Fluit; M R Visser; F J Schmitz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  The role of DNA amplification technology in the diagnosis of infectious diseases.

Authors:  M Louie; L Louie; A E Simor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  Y Cetinkaya; P Falk; C G Mayhall
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Comparison of PCR assay to culture for surveillance detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; William E Trick; Fred C Tenover; Mary Lankford; Susan Cunningham; Valentina Stosor; Ralph L Cordell; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Rapid detection of antimicrobial-resistant organism carriage: an unmet clinical need.

Authors:  Daniel J Diekema; Kirsty J Dodgson; Bryndis Sigurdardottir; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of three PCR primer sets for identification of vanB gene carriage in feces and correlation with carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: interference by vanB-containing anaerobic bacilli.

Authors:  S A Ballard; E A Grabsch; P D R Johnson; M L Grayson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Utility of direct, real-time PCR in the management of a nosocomial outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (vanB genotype).

Authors:  H A Al-Mohri; M A Tadros; L Louie; M Vearncombe; A E Simor
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and standard microbiological techniques in presumed bacterial corneal ulcers.

Authors:  Anita Panda; Tajinder Pal Singh; Geeta Satpathy; Meenakshi Wadhwani
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.