Literature DB >> 9274769

Contrast dependency of motion-onset and pattern-reversal VEPs: interaction of stimulus type, recording site and response component.

M Bach1, D Ullrich.   

Abstract

We compared the contrast dependency (from 0.4 to 98%) of the visual evoked potential (VEP) to motion onset and to pattern reversal at an occipital and lateral recording site using sinewave grating stimuli of 0.9 c/deg, drifting at 4.9 deg/sec. Two differing VEP components were identified: a positive component, peaking at around 130 msec, dominating the occipital derivation, enhanced in pattern-reversal stimulation, a high-threshold, late-saturating contrast response characteristic with a half-amplitude contrast above 7%; and a negative component at around 180 msec, dominating the lateral derivation, enhanced in motion-onset stimulation, exhibiting a low-threshold, saturating contrast characteristic with a half-amplitude contrast below 4%. The results suggest: (1) The negative component (N180) represents motion mechanisms, located more laterally, while the positive component (P100-P130) represents form-processing mechanisms, located near the V1/V2 areas. (2) A pattern-reversal stimulus triggers both form-processing and motion mechanisms that can be discriminated by latency. In an occipital derivation, the clinical reversal VEP P100 will be little contaminated by motion responses.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9274769     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00317-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  Motion adaptation in chromatic motion-onset visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  D J McKeefry
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Relationship between motion VEP and perceived velocity of gratings: effects of stimulus speed and motion adaptation.

Authors:  Rolf Müller; Gunder Bochmann; Mark W Greenlee; Edith Göpfert
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Isolating motion responses in visual evoked potentials by preadapting flicker-sensitive mechanisms.

Authors:  J Peter Maurer; Michael Bach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motion-onset auditory-evoked potentials critically depend on history.

Authors:  Ramona Grzeschik; Martin Böckmann-Barthel; Roland Mühler; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motion-onset VEPs to translating, radial, rotating and spiral stimuli.

Authors:  Jan Kremlácek; Miroslav Kuba; Zuzana Kubová; Jana Chlubnová
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Motion adaptation: net duration matters, not continuousness.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Anja M Schilling; Michael Bach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual evoked potentials and reaction time measurements to motion-reversal luminance- and texture-defined stimuli.

Authors:  Hadi Chakor; Armando Bertone; Michelle McKerral; Jocelyn Faubert; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Mar-May       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 8.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Early Alzheimer's disease blocks responses to accelerating self-movement.

Authors:  Roberto Fernandez; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Intensity- and timing-dependent modulation of motion perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex.

Authors:  Olga Lucia Gamboa Arana; Hannah Palmer; Moritz Dannhauer; Connor Hile; Sicong Liu; Rena Hamdan; Alexandra Brito; Roberto Cabeza; Simon W Davis; Angel V Peterchev; Marc A Sommer; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.