Literature DB >> 9272526

Risk factors for venous obstruction in children with transvenous pacing leads.

F H Figa1, B W McCrindle, J L Bigras, R M Hamilton, R M Gow.   

Abstract

To determine the incidence and risk factors for venous obstruction in children with transvenous pacing leads, 63 children were evaluated clinically and echocardiographically. Patients with abnormal clinical and/or echocardiographic findings were further investigated by venography. Thirteen patients (21%) had evidence of venous obstruction. Venography in 11 (2 refused) showed that severity of obstruction (as defined by percentage of luminal narrowing) was complete (100%) in 3, severe (> 90%) in 4, and moderate (60%-90%) in 5 (1 patient having 2 sites of obstruction). Risk factors for obstruction in 55 patients with single implantation procedures (10 with obstruction; 18%) were sought. Total cross-sectional area of lead(s) was indexed to body surface area at implantation (INDEX). Patients with obstruction had a higher mean INDEX (7.6 +/- 1.6 mm2/m2) than patients without obstruction (4.9 +/- 2.0 mm2/m2); P < 0.0002). Receiver-operator characteristic curves showed an INDEX > 6.6 mm2/m2 to best predict obstruction, with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 84%. Since pacing is lifelong, sizing of transvenous leads to the child is important to prevent obstruction and preserve venous access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9272526     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb03594.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  15 in total

1.  Superior vena cava and innominate vein dimensions in growing children : an aid for interventional devices and transvenous leads.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sanjeev; Peter P Karpawich
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  An alternate technique to pacing in complex congenital heart disease: assessment of the left thoracotomy approach.

Authors:  Ashley D Roberts; Suvro Sett; Jacques Leblanc; Shubhayan Sanatani
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Comparison of modern steroid-eluting epicardial and thin transvenous pacemaker leads in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Fortescue; Charles I Berul; Frank Cecchin; Edward P Walsh; John K Triedman; Mark E Alexander
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Implantation of an "extracardiac" internal cardioverter defibrillator in a 6-month-old infant.

Authors:  T Kriebel; W Ruschewski; T Paul
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-06

5.  Transvenous pacing after the Mustard procedure: considering the complications.

Authors:  T C Konings; L R C Dekkers; M Groenink; B J Bouma; B J M Mulder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 6.  Pacing device therapy in infants and children: a review.

Authors:  Daiji Takeuchi; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  Pacemaker-associated cyanosis in an adolescent: The answer hiding behind shadows.

Authors:  Sg Wittekind; Jc Salerno; Ae Rubio
Journal:  Images Paediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-10

8.  Normative MDCT cross-sectional data estimation of superior vena cava and innominate vein in growing children using age as a predictor.

Authors:  Karuna M Das; Tariq S Momenah; Rajvir Singh; Shanker Raja; Abdulrahman AlMoukirish; Mohammad AlZoum; Sven G Larsson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Pacing in children.

Authors:  Harinder R Singh; Anjan S Batra; Seshadri Balaji
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-01

10.  Cardiac pacing and defibrillation in children and young adults.

Authors:  Harinder R Singh; Anjan S Batra; Seshadri Balaji
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2013-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.