Literature DB >> 9269723

Goal-directed guidance of attention: evidence from conjunctive visual search.

W J Bacon1, H E Egeth.   

Abstract

Conjunctive visual search is most difficult when distractor types are in equal proportions and gets easier as the proportions diverge (e.g., E. Zohary & S. Hochstein, 1989). This may reflect restriction of search to the feature shared by the target and the less-frequent distractor. Alternatively, such effects could reflect target salience, which varies with distractor ratio. In 2 experiments, 60 participants searched 64-element displays for a conjunctive target among distractors of 2 types in various proportions. Participants were correctly informed (Experiment 1) or misinformed (Experiment 2) about which distractor type would be less frequent on most trials. In both experiments, the distractor-ratio effect was significantly influenced by the information provided to participants. These findings demonstrate the efficacy of top-down information in guiding attention and show that it can be applied flexibly, weighted toward particular target features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9269723     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.4.948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

Authors:  H Pashler; C R Harris
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Search performance with discrete-cell stimulus arrays: filtered naturalistic images and probabilistic markers.

Authors:  Alan R Pinkus; Miriam J Poteet; Allan J Pantle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-03

3.  Effects of learning on color-form conjunction in macaque inferior temporal neurons.

Authors:  Takayuki Sato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search: the roles of top-down and bottom-up processing.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Matthew P Gerrie; Bradley J Poole; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

5.  Functional modular architecture underlying attentional control in aging.

Authors:  Zachary A Monge; Benjamin R Geib; Rachel E Siciliano; Lauren E Packard; Catherine W Tallman; David J Madden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Saccadic selection and crowding in visual search: stronger lateral masking leads to shorter search times.

Authors:  Jelmer P de Vries; Ignace T C Hooge; Marco A Wiering; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of reward history on goal-directed visual search.

Authors:  David S Lee; Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neural basis of feature-based contextual effects on visual search behavior.

Authors:  Kelly Shen; Martin Paré
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.

Authors:  Blaire Dube; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.