Literature DB >> 9269307

Sequence-dependent variations of DNA structure modulate radiation-induced strand breakage.

D Sy1, C Savoye, M Begusova, V Michalik, M Charlier, M Spotheim-Maurizot.   

Abstract

Using a 80 base pair DNA fragment, the sequence-dependence was compared for: (i) the probability of fast neutrons induced strand breakage, (ii) the accessibility of the H4'- and H5'-atoms to OH. attack, (iii) the width of the minor groove, and (iv) the probability of OH. reactions with H4'- or H5'-atoms. The probability of strand breakage was measured using sequencing gel electrophoresis. The accessibility and the probability of reaction were calculated for the energy-minimized modelled DNA fragment. A Monte-Carlo simulation was used for calculating the probabilities of H-atom abstraction by OH.. It was observed that reduced breakage occurs in sequences exhibiting low accessibility of H4' and H5'2 and low probability of H-atom abstraction by OH., due to a narrow, minor groove. This shows that the breakage probability at a given nucleotide site is not determined by the chemical nature of the nucleotide (A, T, G or C), but mainly by the local sequence-modulated intrinsic structure. Fitting the experimental results with the calculated probabilities of reaction suggests that a C4'-centered radical evolves towards a strand break three times more efficiently than the C5' one, and that half of the breaks occur via the 4'-path and half via the 5'-path.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9269307     DOI: 10.1080/095530097143365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  9 in total

1.  Free radical yields in crystalline DNA X-irradiated at 4 K.

Authors:  M G Debije; W A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

3.  Factors affecting the yields of C1' and C5' oxidation products in radiation-damaged DNA: the indirect effect.

Authors:  Charles S Price; Yuriy Razskazovskiy; William A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Direct radiation damage to crystalline DNA: what is the source of unaltered base release?

Authors:  Y Razskazovskiy; M G Debije; W A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  DNA strand damage product analysis provides evidence that the tumor cell-specific cytotoxin tirapazamine produces hydroxyl radical and acts as a surrogate for O(2).

Authors:  Goutam Chowdhury; Venkatraman Junnotula; J Scott Daniels; Marc M Greenberg; Kent S Gates
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Diastereoselective DNA cleavage recognition by Ni(II) x Gly-Gly-His-derived metallopeptides.

Authors:  Ya-Yin Fang; Craig A Claussen; Kenny B Lipkowitz; Eric C Long
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Targeted DNA oxidation and trajectory of radical DNA using DFT based QM/MM dynamics.

Authors:  Pradip K Biswas; Sandipan Chakraborty
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Clustered DNA Damage: Electronic Properties and Their Influence on Charge Transfer. 7,8-Dihydro-8-Oxo-2'-Deoxyguaosine Versus 5',8-Cyclo-2'-Deoxyadenosines: A Theoretical Approach.

Authors:  Boleslaw T Karwowski
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  [How can an electron induce oxidative damage in DNA in solution].

Authors:  Jun Ma; Sergey Denisov; Amitava Adhikary; Mehran Mostafavi
Journal:  Actual Chim       Date:  2020-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.