Literature DB >> 9268835

Image display for clinicians on medical record workstations.

B J Erickson1, W J Ryan, D G Gehring, C Beebe.   

Abstract

Image display on electronic medical record (EMR) workstations is an important step in widespread implementation of picture archiving and communications systems (PACS). We describe a pilot project for implementing image display capability that is integrated with the EMR software, and will allow display of images on the physician's workstation. We believe this pilot will provide valuable information about usage patterns in image display needs, which will be valuable in planning further expansion of PACS in our institution.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9268835      PMCID: PMC3452819          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: comparison with cathode ray tube displays.

Authors:  W Pavlicek; J M Owen; M B Peter
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  New aspects of image distribution and workflow in radiology.

Authors:  S Mack; J Holstein; K Kleber; D H Grönemeyer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Functional requirements of a desktop clinical image display application.

Authors:  B J Erickson; W J Ryan; D G Gehring
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Irreversible compression of medical images.

Authors:  Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application.

Authors:  B J Erickson; W J Ryan; D G Gehring; C Beebe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  The primary interpretation workstation: information beyond image data.

Authors:  K J Dreyer; A Mehta; K M Johnson; T Schultz; D Sack
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods.

Authors:  B Güniz Baksi; Aleš Fidler
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Performance and function of a desktop viewer at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale.

Authors:  W G Eversman; W Pavlicek; B Zavalkovskiy; B J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Selection and pilot implementation of a mobile image viewer: a case study.

Authors:  Christine Marie Zwart; Miao He; Teresa Wu; Bart M Demaerschalk; Joseph Ross Mitchell; Amy K Hara
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.773

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.