Literature DB >> 9262288

Selective transfer of cryopreserved human embryos with further cleavage after thawing increases delivery and implantation rates.

J Van der Elst1, E Van den Abbeel, S Vitrier, M Camus, P Devroey, A C Van Steirteghem.   

Abstract

We investigated whether further in-vitro culture of human multicellular embryos that survive cryopreservation can select the viable embryos for transfer. Embryos for cryopreservation were supernumerary multicellular embryos obtained after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments, with <20% of their volume filled with anucleate fragments. These had been cryopreserved using a slow-freezing and slow-thawing protocol with 1.5 M dimethylsulphoxide as the cryoprotectant. From the start of our cryopreservation programme until September 12, 1994, the thawing strategy was to thaw frozen embryos up to the exact number needed for transfer. Embryos for transfer were selected on the basis of their morphological appearance and embryo transfer to the patient was done on the day of thawing. From September 12, 1994 onwards we used a more selective thawing strategy where a cohort of up to a maximum of 12 frozen embryos per patient is thawed from which embryos of the best morphological quality, and which are furthest advanced in terms of cleavage after a 24 h in-vitro culture period in Menezo B2 medium, are selected. We took delivery rates, embryo implantation rates and birth rates into account to see if there is any difference between the following three types of transfers used: 187 transfers exclusively of embryos having continued to cleave after thawing, 107 mixed transfers of embryos with and without further cleavage and 53 transfers exclusively of embryos with no further cleavage. The overall outcome in terms of delivery rate and embryo implantation and birth rates were not different between the new and the earlier thawing policies (6.6, 5.2 and 3.6% versus 6.0, 4.1 and 2.7% respectively). Only when a distinction was made between transfers on the basis of the presence of embryos with further cleavage, did the advantage of selection on the basis of cleavage capacity become evident. Significantly higher delivery and embryo implantation and birth rates (11.2, 7.7 and 6.5% respectively) were recorded with transfers exclusively of embryos with further cleavage versus mixed transfers of embryos with and without further cleavage (1.9, 2.9 and 0.6% respectively). Fifty-three transfers exclusively of embryos with no further cleavage did not lead to any delivery. Our results demonstrate that selection of human multicellular embryos which survive cryopreservation and continue to cleave in vitro can significantly improve the delivery rate per transfer and the implantation rate per transferred embryo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9262288     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  19 in total

1.  The influence of prefreeze growth rate and blastomere number on cryosurvival and subsequent implantation of human embryos.

Authors:  D H Edgar; H Jericho; H Bourne; J C McBain
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Xing-ling Wang; Xiao Zhang; Yao-qin Qin; Da-yong Hao; Hui-rong Shi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Homa Oskouian; Shahnaz Ahmadi; Leila Oskouian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Comparison of growth rates of fresh and frozen-thawed embryos according to chromosomal status.

Authors:  Rohini Edirisinghe; Rodney Jemmott; John Allan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The outcome of different post-thawed culture period in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle.

Authors:  Lei Guo; Chen Luo; Song Quan; Leining Chen; Hong Li; Yangchun Guo; Zhiming Han; Xianghong Ou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Comparison of the cryopreservation of human embryos obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with a slow cooling or an ultrarapid cooling procedure.

Authors:  A L Mauri; C G Petersen; R L Baruffi; R C Ferreira; J G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in China: clinical outcomes of two and three multicellular embryos transfers.

Authors:  Yijuan Sun; Yun Feng; Aijun Zhang; Xiaowei Lu; Zhihong Niu; Ruihuan Gu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Transfer of human frozen-thawed embryos with further cleavage during culture increases pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Bharat V Joshi; Manish R Banker; Pravin M Patel; Preeti B Shah
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-05

9.  Analyzing factors affecting the success rate of frozen-thawed embryos.

Authors:  S Lahav-Baratz; M Koifman; H Shiloh; D Ishai; Z Wiener-Megnazi; M Dirnfeld
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Vitrification can modify embryo cleavage stage after warming. Should we change endometrial preparation?

Authors:  R Cercas; C Villas; I Pons; C Braña; S Fernandez-Shaw
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.