Literature DB >> 24154797

The outcome of different post-thawed culture period in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle.

Lei Guo1, Chen Luo, Song Quan, Leining Chen, Hong Li, Yangchun Guo, Zhiming Han, Xianghong Ou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the influence of post-thawed culture (2-4 h and 20-24 h) on the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 1,353 patients were undergoing the FET treatment at the reproductive medical center between June 2010 and July 2012. 3,398 frozen-thawed embryos were divided in two study groups, depending on their post-thawed culture period: short culture (2-4 h) group and long culture (20-24 h) group. Groups were compared including clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, spontaneous abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, live birth rate and birth weight.
RESULTS: When embryos including at least one grade I embryo after thawed transferred, the clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, multiple pregnancy rate, abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, live birth rate and birth weight were similar in the short culture group compared with these in the long culture group.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of the two approaches (short culture and long culture) are no different in FET cycles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24154797      PMCID: PMC3843182          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0120-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  20 in total

1.  A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos.

Authors:  D H Edgar; H Bourne; A L Speirs; J C McBain
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Parameters guiding selection of best embryos for transfer after cryopreservation: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Fabrice Guerif; Rachel Bidault; Veronique Cadoret; Marie-Laure Couet; Jacques Lansac; Dominique Royere
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Day 3 compared with day 2 cryopreservation does not affect embryo survival but improves the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

Authors:  Christophe Sifer; Afifa Sellami; Christophe Poncelet; Brigitte Martin-Pont; Raphael Porcher; Jean-Noel Hugues; Jean-Philippe Wolf
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Frozen-thawed transfer cycles: are they comparable with fresh?

Authors:  E V Mocanu; E Cottell; K Waite; B Hennelly; C Collins; R F Harrison
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2008-06

5.  Physical factors are involved in the destruction of embryos and oocytes during freezing and thawing procedures.

Authors:  M J Ashwood-Smith; G W Morris; R Fowler; T C Appleton; R Ashorn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.

Authors:  A P Ferraretti; V Goossens; J de Mouzon; S Bhattacharya; J A Castilla; V Korsak; M Kupka; K G Nygren; A Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Vitrification demonstrates significant improvement versus slow freezing of human blastocysts.

Authors:  Ed Stehlik; Joni Stehlik; K Paul Katayama; Masashige Kuwayama; Varya Jambor; Rebecca Brohammer; Osama Kato
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  The predictive value of using a combined Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology score in the assessment of embryo survival on day 5.

Authors:  Kuo-Chung Lan; Fu-Jen Huang; Yi-Chi Lin; Fu-Tsai Kung; Chin-Hsiung Hsieh; Hsuan-Wei Huang; Ping-Heng Tan; Shiuh Young Chang
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Objective way to support embryo transfer: a probabilistic decision.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; L Gambardella; A Giusti; C Grugnetti; G Corani
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Influence of post-thaw culture on the developmental potential of human frozen embryos.

Authors:  Mafalda L Rato; António Gouveia-Oliveira; Carlos E Plancha
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

View more
  6 in total

1.  Morula transfer achieves better clinical outcomes than post-thawed cleavage embryos after overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Authors:  Dongna Hui; Xiaofang Han; Xiaocheng Wang; Wenjuan Ren; Xin Lei; Jianrong Liu; Lina Dong; Hong Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Effect of post-warming culture time on the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer.

Authors:  Huy H Pham; Trinh M Vu; Chau H Nguyen; Anh H Le; Dung P Nguyen; Toan D Pham; Tuong M Ho; Lan N Vuong
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme?

Authors:  Azam Agha-Rahimi; Marjan Omidi; Fatemeh Akyash; Azita Faramarzi; Forough Alsadat Farshchi
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-30

4.  The effect of fresh IVF cycle characteristics on frozen embryo transfer (FET) outcomes.

Authors:  Nayla J Bushaqer; Noor N Alkhudhairy; Ziyad M Alturaigi; Rowaida M Alhamad; Wadha A Mohawesh; Fatema E Alraka; Hisham A Ayyoub; M Dayou Nawal
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-05-01

5.  The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles.

Authors:  Ji Young Hwang; Jae Kyun Park; Tae Hyung Kim; Jin Hee Eum; HaengSeok Song; Jin Young Kim; Han Moie Park; Chan Woo Park; Woo Sik Lee; Sang Woo Lyu
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2020-11-10

6.  Association of the duration of post-thaw culture with clinical outcome after vitrified-warmed day 3 embryo transfer in 10,464 cycles: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Haiyan Zhu; Wen Xu; Xiaoying Jin; Yamei Xue; Xiaomei Tong; Songying Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.