Literature DB >> 9259642

Facial inversion effects: parts and whole relationship.

S S Rakover1, B Teucher.   

Abstract

"Facial inversion effects" refers to the findings that recognition of inverted faces is less accurate than recognition of upright faces. We now report inversion effects for isolated facial features: forehead, eyes, nose, mouth, and chin. This shows that configurational information extracted from a whole face (i.e., from spatial relationships among the facial features) is not necessary for obtaining the inversion effects. Other factors, such as "upright-orientation," mental rotation, and feature saliency, account for the inversion effects both in a whole face and in its isolated features. We propose a simple formula that satisfactorily predicts the recognition of a whole face and the inversion effects for that face on the basis of its individual features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9259642     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  16 in total

1.  When false recognition is out of control: the case of facial conjunctions.

Authors:  Todd C Jones; James C Bartlett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

2.  A feature-inversion effect: can an isolated feature show behavior like the face-inversion effect?

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

3.  The time course of processing external and internal features of unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Bozana Veres-Injac; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-04-18

Review 4.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

5.  Explaining the face-inversion effect: the face-scheme incompatibility (FSI) model.

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

6.  The Thatcher illusion in humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Christoph D Dahl; Nikos K Logothetis; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Information-processing alternatives to holistic perception: identifying the mechanisms of secondary-level holism within a categorization paradigm.

Authors:  Mario Fifić; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; Alexander Bratch; W Drew Bromfield; Roy A Goode; Mary Jones; Doori Lee; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

9.  From upright to upside-down presentation: a spatio-temporal ERP study of the parametric effect of rotation on face and house processing.

Authors:  Boutheina Jemel; Julie Coutya; Caroline Langer; Sylvain Roy
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Optimal eye-gaze fixation position for face-related neural responses.

Authors:  Younes Zerouali; Jean-Marc Lina; Boutheina Jemel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.