Literature DB >> 9258662

Genetic alterations in primary breast cancers and their metastases: direct comparison using modified comparative genomic hybridization.

T Nishizaki1, S DeVries, K Chew, W H Goodson, B M Ljung, A Thor, F M Waldman.   

Abstract

Breast tumor development and progression are thought to be driven by an accumulation of genetic alterations, but little is known about the specific changes that occur during the metastatic process. We analyzed pairs of primary breast cancers and their matched lymph node metastases from 11 patients, pairs of primaries and distant metastases from three patients, and pairs of primaries, and local recurrences from two patients by using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Simultaneous hybridization analysis of primary versus matched lesion DNAs from 11 patients was also performed (modified CGH). This modified approach was useful not only for confirming CGH results but also for demonstrating quantitative differences between aberrations present at both sites. Frequent chromosomal changes present at both sites (> 35% of 16 cases) were 1q, 8q, and 17q gains and 6q, 8p, 9q, 13q, 16q, 17p, and Xp losses. The total number of aberrations detected exclusively in the lymph nodes or distant metastases was higher than that in the primary tumors (2.5 vs. 0.7, P < 0.05). We found high-level amplifications in four metastases (two lymph nodes and two distant metastases), but none in any primary tumor. These findings suggest that progression from primary breast cancer to metastasis may be associated with the acquisition of further genetic changes. Although further investigations are required, it was of interest that 3 of 11 patients (27%) showed 18q loss solely in their lymph node metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9258662     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199708)19:4<267::aid-gcc9>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  46 in total

1.  Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of genetic alterations associated with malignant progression of meningioma.

Authors:  S Ozaki; T Nishizaki; H Ito; K Sasaki
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  The abnormalities of chromosome 8 in two hepatocellular carcinoma cell clones with the same genetic background and different metastatic potential.

Authors:  Jiong Yang; Lun-Xiu Qin; Sheng-Long Ye; Yin-Kun Liu; Yan Li; Dong-Mei Gao; Jie Chen; Zhao-You Tang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Telomere loss provokes multiple pathways to apoptosis and produces genomic instability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Simon W A Titen; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Demystified ... FISH.

Authors:  J J Waters; A L Barlow; C P Gould
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  1998-04

Review 5.  DNA copy number amplifications in human neoplasms: review of comparative genomic hybridization studies.

Authors:  S Knuutila; A M Björkqvist; K Autio; M Tarkkanen; M Wolf; O Monni; J Szymanska; M L Larramendy; J Tapper; H Pere; W El-Rifai; S Hemmer; V M Wasenius; V Vidgren; Y Zhu
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  The Cellular Origin and Evolution of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Mei Zhang; Adrian V Lee; Jeffrey M Rosen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 7.  A new branch on the tree: next-generation sequencing in the study of cancer evolution.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Brosnan; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 7.727

8.  Challenges in identifying candidate amplification targets in human cancers: chromosome 8q21 as a case study.

Authors:  Jennifer A Byrne; Yuyan Chen; Nancy Martin La Rotta; Gregory B Peters
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2012-02

9.  A genomic and transcriptomic approach for a differential diagnosis between primary and secondary ovarian carcinomas in patients with a previous history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Meyniel; Paul H Cottu; Charles Decraene; Marc-Henri Stern; Jérôme Couturier; Ingrid Lebigot; André Nicolas; Nina Weber; Virginie Fourchotte; Séverine Alran; Audrey Rapinat; David Gentien; Sergio Roman-Roman; Laurent Mignot; Xavier Sastre-Garau
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Genomic signatures of breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  V Urquidi; S Goodison
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.