Lauren S Chernick1, Rebecca Schnall2, Tracy Higgins2, Melissa S Stockwell3, Paula M Castaño4, John Santelli3, Peter S Dayan5. 1. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, NY, United States. Electronic address: Lc2243@columbia.edu. 2. Department of Nursing, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, NY, United States. 3. Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, NY, United States; Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, NY, United States. 4. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, NY, United States. 5. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, NY, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Over 15 million adolescents, many at high risk for pregnancy, use emergency departments (EDs) in the United States annually, but little is known regarding reasons for failure to use contraceptives in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify the barriers to and enablers of contraceptive use among adolescent females using the ED and determine their interest in an ED-based pregnancy prevention intervention. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted semistructured, open-ended interviews with females in an urban ED. Eligible females were 14-19 years old, sexually active, presenting for reproductive health complaints and at risk for pregnancy, defined as nonuse of effective (per the World Health Organization) contraception. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded based on thematic analysis. Enrollment continued until no new themes emerged. A modified Health Belief Model guided the organization of the data. RESULTS: Participants (n=14) were predominantly Hispanic (93%), insured (93%) and in a sexual relationship (86%). The primary barrier to contraceptive use was perceived health risk, including effects on menstruation, weight and future fertility. Other barriers consisted of mistrust in contraceptives, ambivalent pregnancy intentions, uncertainty about the future, partner's desire for pregnancy and limited access to contraceptives. Enablers of past contraceptive use included the presence of a school-based health clinic and clear plans for the future. All participants were receptive to ED-based pregnancy prevention interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The identified barriers and enablers influencing hormonal contraceptive use can be used to inform the design of future ED-based adolescent pregnancy prevention interventions. IMPLICATIONS: Adolescents who visit the emergency department (ED) identify contraceptive side effects, mistrust in contraceptives, limited access, pregnancy ambivalence and partner pregnancy desires as barriers to hormonal contraception use. They expressed interest in an ED-based intervention to prevent adolescent pregnancy; such an intervention could target these themes to maximize effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: Over 15 million adolescents, many at high risk for pregnancy, use emergency departments (EDs) in the United States annually, but little is known regarding reasons for failure to use contraceptives in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify the barriers to and enablers of contraceptive use among adolescent females using the ED and determine their interest in an ED-based pregnancy prevention intervention. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted semistructured, open-ended interviews with females in an urban ED. Eligible females were 14-19 years old, sexually active, presenting for reproductive health complaints and at risk for pregnancy, defined as nonuse of effective (per the World Health Organization) contraception. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded based on thematic analysis. Enrollment continued until no new themes emerged. A modified Health Belief Model guided the organization of the data. RESULTS:Participants (n=14) were predominantly Hispanic (93%), insured (93%) and in a sexual relationship (86%). The primary barrier to contraceptive use was perceived health risk, including effects on menstruation, weight and future fertility. Other barriers consisted of mistrust in contraceptives, ambivalent pregnancy intentions, uncertainty about the future, partner's desire for pregnancy and limited access to contraceptives. Enablers of past contraceptive use included the presence of a school-based health clinic and clear plans for the future. All participants were receptive to ED-based pregnancy prevention interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The identified barriers and enablers influencing hormonal contraceptive use can be used to inform the design of future ED-based adolescent pregnancy prevention interventions. IMPLICATIONS: Adolescents who visit the emergency department (ED) identify contraceptive side effects, mistrust in contraceptives, limited access, pregnancy ambivalence and partner pregnancy desires as barriers to hormonal contraception use. They expressed interest in an ED-based intervention to prevent adolescent pregnancy; such an intervention could target these themes to maximize effectiveness.
Authors: Elizabeth Miller; Heather L McCauley; Daniel J Tancredi; Michele R Decker; Heather Anderson; Jay G Silverman Journal: Contraception Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Marion W Carter; Anna R Bergdall; Dare Henry-Moss; Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy; Linda Hock-Long Journal: Contraception Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Elizabeth R Alpern; Amy E Clark; Evaline A Alessandrini; Marc H Gorelick; Marlena Kittick; Rachel M Stanley; J Michael Dean; Stephen J Teach; James M Chamberlain Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Michelle Solomon; Gia M Badolato; Lauren S Chernick; Maria E Trent; James M Chamberlain; Monika K Goyal Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2019-05-20
Authors: Melissa K Miller; Kimberly A Randell; Romina Barral; Ashley K Sherman; Elizabeth Miller Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Lauren S Chernick; Margaret Berrigan; Ariana Gonzalez; Alexis Konja; Melissa S Stockwell; Anke Ehrhardt; Susanne Bakken; Carolyn L Westhoff; John Santelli; Peter S Dayan Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Anna W Brittain; Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno; Karen Pazol; Lauren B Zapata; Emily Decker; Julia M Rollison; Nikita M Malcolm; Lisa M Romero; Emilia H Koumans Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lauren S Chernick; Melissa S Stockwell; Mengfei Wu; Paula M Castaño; Rebecca Schnall; Carolyn L Westhoff; John Santelli; Peter S Dayan Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 5.012