Literature DB >> 16937164

Factors affecting the stimulus artifact tail in surface-recorded somatosensory-evoked potentials.

Y Hua1, D F Lovely, R Doraiswami.   

Abstract

Surface-recorded somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) are neural signals elicited by an external stimulus. In the case of electrically induced SEPs, the artifact generated by the stimulation process can severely distort the signal. In some cases, the artifact tail often lasts well into the initiation of the SEP making the determination of absolute latency very difficult. In this work, a new approach was taken to identify factors that affect the tail of the artifact. The methodology adopted was the development of a lumped electrical circuit model of the artifact generation process. While the modeling of the instrumentation hardware is relatively simple, this is not the case with tissue and electrode/skin interface effects. Consequently, this paper describes a novel tissue modeling approach that uses an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) parametric technique and an artificial neural network (ANN) to estimate tissue parameters from experimental data. This coupled with an estimation of the stimulation electrode-skin impedance completes the lumped circuit model. Simulink (The Mathworks Inc.) was used to evaluate the model under several different conditions. These results show that both the stimulation electrode-skin interface impedance and nature of the body tissue directly under the recording electrodes have a profound effect on the appearance of the stimulus artifact tail. This was verified by experimentally recorded data obtained from the median nerve using surface electrodes. Conclusions drawn from this work include that stimulation electrodes with low series capacitance should be used whenever possible to minimize the duration of the artifact tail.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16937164     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-006-0034-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  13 in total

1.  Influence of recording instrumentation on the stimulus artifact tail in the surface acquisition of somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  N Hamming; D F Lovely
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Stimulus artefact in somatosensory evoked potential measurement.

Authors:  R N Scott; L McLean; P A Parker
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Suppression of simulation artifacts from myoelectric-evoked potential recordings.

Authors:  M Knaflitz; R Merletti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  An electronic stimulus artifact suppressor.

Authors:  J A Freeman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-08

5.  Low noise alternating current amplifier and compensator to reduce stimulus artefact.

Authors:  V O Andersen; F Buchthal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1970-09

6.  Stimulus artefact suppressor for EMG recording during FES by a constant-current stimulator.

Authors:  J Minzly; J Mizrahi; N Hakim; A Liberson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  On the nature and elimination of stimulus artifact in nerve signals evoked and recorded using surface electrodes.

Authors:  K C McGill; K L Cummins; L J Dorfman; B B Berlizot; K Leutkemeyer; D G Nishimura; B Widrow
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Hybrid stimulator for chronic experiments.

Authors:  F Del Pozo; J M Delgado
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  A sample and hold amplifier system for stimulus artifact suppression.

Authors:  T L Babb; E Mariani; G M Strain; J P Lieb; H V Soper; P H Crandall
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-04

10.  A simplified circuit for stimulus artifact suppression.

Authors:  R J Roby
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Optic nerve potentials and cortical potentials after stimulation of the anterior visual pathway during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Mitja Benedičič; Roman Bošnjak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Mixed-signal template-based reduction scheme for stimulus artifact removal in electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Thi Kim Thoa Nguyen; Silke Musa; Wolfgang Eberle; Carmen Bartic; Georges Gielen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.602

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.