Literature DB >> 9245603

A comparison of the folding kinetics and thermodynamics of two homologous fibronectin type III modules.

K W Plaxco1, C Spitzfaden, I D Campbell, C M Dobson.   

Abstract

The homologous ninth and tenth type III modules of human fibronectin share identical topologies and nearly identical core structures. Despite these structural similarities, the refolding characteristics of the two modules, which have a sequence identity of less than 30 %, are very different; in the absence of denaturant the ninth module folds several hundred times more slowly than the tenth and, although both modules contain numerous proline residues, only the ninth exhibits a slow, proline isomerization-limited folding phase. The different folding kinetics of the two modules coincide with a large difference in their thermodynamic stability, with the folding free energy of the tenth being approximately five fold greater than that of the ninth. This may be the reason why the ninth module, unlike the rapidly folding tenth module, is apparently unable to overcome characteristics of the fibronectin type III modules that can slow the folding process. The non-proline-limited folding kinetics are, however, very similar for the two modules when compared under conditions where their overall stabilities are similar. The significance of this finding is discussed in terms of possible determinants of the kinetics of protein folding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9245603     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  35 in total

1.  Folding of beta-sandwich proteins: three-state transition of a fibronectin type III module.

Authors:  E Cota; J Clarke
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Native topology determines force-induced unfolding pathways in globular proteins.

Authors:  D K Klimov; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Unfolding of titin domains explains the viscoelastic behavior of skeletal myofibrils.

Authors:  A Minajeva; M Kulke; J M Fernandez; W A Linke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The topomer-sampling model of protein folding.

Authors:  D A Debe; M J Carlson; W A Goddard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mechanical and chemical unfolding of a single protein: a comparison.

Authors:  M Carrion-Vazquez; A F Oberhauser; S B Fowler; P E Marszalek; S E Broedel; J Clarke; J M Fernandez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Folding rate prediction using total contact distance.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Simulated refolding of stretched titin immunoglobulin domains.

Authors:  M Gao; H Lu; K Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Comparison of the early stages of forced unfolding for fibronectin type III modules.

Authors:  D Craig; A Krammer; K Schulten; V Vogel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Contact order revisited: influence of protein size on the folding rate.

Authors:  Dmitry N Ivankov; Sergiy O Garbuzynskiy; Eric Alm; Kevin W Plaxco; David Baker; Alexei V Finkelstein
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Forced unfolding of the fibronectin type III module reveals a tensile molecular recognition switch.

Authors:  A Krammer; H Lu; B Isralewitz; K Schulten; V Vogel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.