Literature DB >> 9244072

Rate and classification of interval cancers in the breast screening programme.

P A Sylvester1, E Kutt, A Baird, M N Vipond, A J Webb, J R Farndon.   

Abstract

There has been concern about the number of interval cancers which have been detected within the National Breast Screening Programme. A series of 134 women presenting with interval cancers was studied by prospective audit and the rate and radiological classification of the tumours determined. The cancers were classified as true (67), false-negative (22), unclassifiable (28), occult (12), and minimal sign (5). The interval cancer rate did not achieve the new National Guidelines in either the first 2 years or the 3rd interval year. The false-negative cancers presented mainly in the 1st interval year, whereas the true cancers were predominantly confined to the 2nd and 3rd years. These data suggest that alterations to the screening programme may be beneficial. It may be, however, that the programme is still on the learning curve and this should be taken into account when interpreting these data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9244072      PMCID: PMC2502820     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  6 in total

1.  Screening for breast cancer, time to think--and stop?

Authors:  M Baum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-08-12       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  NHS breast screening programme: is the high incidence of interval cancers inevitable?

Authors:  D Asbury; C R Boggis; D Sheals; A G Threlfall; C B Woodman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-30

3.  Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms.

Authors:  J Brown; S Bryan; R Warren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-30

4.  Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.

Authors:  H C Burrell; D M Sibbering; A R Wilson; S E Pinder; A J Evans; L J Yeoman; C W Elston; I O Ellis; R W Blamey; J F Robertson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in NHS breast screening programme's north western region.

Authors:  C B Woodman; A G Threlfall; C R Boggis; P Prior
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

6.  UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  N J Wald; P Murphy; P Major; C Parkes; J Townsend; C Frost
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-04
  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Is clinical breast examination an acceptable alternative to mammographic screening?

Authors:  I Mittra; M Baum; H Thornton; J Houghton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-28

2.  The Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment and Surgical Treatment of Interval and Screen-Detected Breast Cancer in Older Women.

Authors:  Martha E Goodrich; Julie Weiss; Tracy Onega; Steve L Balch; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  A study of interval breast cancer within the NHS breast screening programme.

Authors:  W K Cowan; B Angus; J C Gray; L G Lunt; S R al-Tamimi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.