Literature DB >> 9243478

Multiple local minima in radiotherapy optimization problems with dose-volume constraints.

J O Deasy1.   

Abstract

The cause of multiple local minima in beam weight optimization problems subject to dose-volume constraints is analyzed. Three objective functions were considered: (a) maximization of tumor control probability (TCP), (b) maximization of the minimum target dose, and (c) minimization of the mean-squared-deviation of the target dose from the prescription dose. It is shown that: (a) TCP models generally result in strongly quasiconvex objective functions; (b) maximization of the minimum target dose results in a strongly quasiconvex objective function; and (c) minimizing the root-mean-square dose deviation results in a convex objective function. Dose-volume constraints are considered such that, for each region at risk (RAR), the volume of tissue whose dose exceeds a certain tolerance dose (DTol) is kept equal to or below a given fractional level (VTol). If all RARs lack a "volume effect" (i.e., VTol = 0 for all RARs) then there is a single local minimum. But if volume effects are present, then the feasible space is possibly nonconvex and therefore possibly leads to multiple local minima. These conclusions hold for all three objective functions. Hence, possible local minima come not from the nonlinear nature of the objective functions considered, but from the "either this volume or that volume but not both" nature of the volume effect. These observations imply that optimization algorithms for dose-volume constraint types of problems should have effective strategies for dealing with multiple local minima.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9243478     DOI: 10.1118/1.598017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Toward truly optimal IMRT dose distribution: inverse planning with voxel-specific penalty.

Authors:  Pavel Lougovski; Jordan LeNoach; Lei Zhu; Yunzhi Ma; Yair Censor; Lei Xing
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-12

2.  A novel reduced-order prioritized optimization method for radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Georgios Kalantzis; Aditya Apte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Integrating soft and hard dose-volume constraints into hierarchical constrained IMRT optimization.

Authors:  Sovanlal Mukherjee; Linda Hong; Joseph O Deasy; Masoud Zarepisheh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  An Automatic Approach for Satisfying Dose-Volume Constraints in Linear Fluence Map Optimization for IMPT.

Authors:  Maryam Zaghian; Gino Lim; Wei Liu; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  J Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-02

5.  A Risk-Adjusted Control Chart to Evaluate Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Plan Quality.

Authors:  Arkajyoti Roy; Dan Cutright; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Arthur B Yeh; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-04

6.  A two-stage sequential linear programming approach to IMRT dose optimization.

Authors:  Hao H Zhang; Robert R Meyer; Jianzhou Wu; Shahid A Naqvi; Leyuan Shi; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer using prioritized prescription optimization and mean-tail-dose functions.

Authors:  V H Clark; Y Chen; J Wilkens; J R Alaly; K Zakaryan; J O Deasy
Journal:  Linear Algebra Appl       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 1.401

8.  Evaluation of hybrid inverse planning and optimization (HIPO) algorithm for optimization in real-time, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate.

Authors:  Shyam Pokharel; Suresh Rana; Joseph Blikenstaff; Amir Sadeghi; Bradley Prestidge
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using multicriteria optimization for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Ghandour; Oscar Matzinger; Marc Pachoud
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  The effect of interfraction prostate motion on IMRT plans: a dose-volume histogram analysis using a Gaussian error function model.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Runqing Jiang; Daniel Markel
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.