Literature DB >> 9243384

Cine MR Fourier velocimetry of blood flow through cardiac valves: comparison with Doppler echocardiography.

R H Mohiaddin1, P D Gatehouse, M Henien, D N Firmin.   

Abstract

Noninvasive measurement of blood flow velocity through the cardiac valves has important clinical applications. A wide variety of MR methods are available for flow measurement. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of cine MR Fourier velocimetry to measure flow through healthy cardiac valves and to compare MR and Doppler peak velocity measurements. Ten healthy volunteers (age mean +/- SD, 24 +/- 4 years) without history of valvular disease were studied. Four of the subjects were females. In each subject, aortic, pulmonary, mitral, and tricuspid valves were evaluated with MR and Doppler imaging. A whole-body mobile MR machine was used, operating at .5-T with actively shielded magnetic field gradient coils on all three axes capable of 20 mT/m at a slew rate of 60 mT/ m/msec. The heart rate during MR and Doppler studies was not significantly different. The mean difference between the two studies was 2 beats/min, with a 95% confidence interval of -22 beats/min, +25 beats/ min. Peak systolic flow velocity in the aortic and pulmonary valves and peak diastolic flow velocity in the mitral and tricuspid valves measured with MRI and Doppler echocardiography correlated well. The mean difference between the two measurements (MR-Doppler) was 63 mm/sec, with a 95% confidence interval of -180 mm/sec, +310 mm/sec. The agreement between two observers interpreting the same MR velocity maps was close. The mean difference between their two measurements was 23 mm/sec, with a 95% confidence interval of -20 mm/sec, +60 mm/sec. There was no significant difference between MR and Doppler imaging or between the two MR observers. MR Fourier velocimetry has the necessary ease, reliability, and speed to measure blood flow through the cardiac valves, although measurement of late diastolic flow in the atrioventricular valves is limited. Measurement of peak blood velocity through the cardiac valves by this method showed satisfactory agreement with Doppler, but its clinical application for assessing diseased cardiac valves must be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9243384     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  9 in total

Review 1.  Complex flow patterns in the great vessels: a review.

Authors:  H G Bogren; M H Buonocore
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

Review 2.  Multi-modality imaging of diastolic function.

Authors:  Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Evaluation of nonischemic cardiomyopathies using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Rory O'Hanlon; Sanjay K Prasad; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  [Methods for coronary functional assessment].

Authors:  M Elsner
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 5.  Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Philip J Kilner; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging assessment of diastolic dysfunction in a population without heart disease: a gender-based study.

Authors:  Bruno Graça; Maria João Ferreira; Paulo Donato; Miguel Castelo-Branco; Filipe Caseiro-Alves
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of diastolic dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Shah M Azarisman; Karen S Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 8.  Imaging techniques in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Sá; Albert de Roos; Jos J M Westenberg; Lucia J M Kroft
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review & meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kei Woldendorp; Paul G Bannon; Stuart M Grieve
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.364

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.