Literature DB >> 9241075

Age-related differences in breast carcinoma knowledge, beliefs, and perceived risk among women visiting an academic general medicine practice.

N C Dolan1, A M Lee, M M McDermott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study assessed whether age-related differences in breast carcinoma knowledge and perceived risk exist among women in a primary care setting and whether these women's beliefs about the best age to begin screening mammography reflect those of their physicians.
METHODS: Consecutive women ages 30-70 years who visited an academic general medicine practice were asked to complete a questionnaire assessing breast carcinoma knowledge, beliefs, and perceived risk. Women's risk estimates were compared with individual risk probabilities derived from the Gail model. Women's beliefs about when to begin screening mammography were compared with the beliefs of the attending physicians in the practice. Questionnaire results were compared across age groups.
RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-four women completed the survey. Overall, knowledge scores were negatively correlated with age (correlation coefficient = -0.30, P = 0.001). The level of knowledge about the benefits of mammography was high across all age groups. In contrast, knowledge that breast carcinoma incidence increases with age was poor. Only 28% of all women recognized that breast carcinoma is more common among women age 65 years than among women age 40 years. Among all women, 26% underestimated their risk of developing breast carcinoma in the next 10 years, 32% correctly estimated their risk, and 42% overestimated their risk. Fifty-five percent thought that mammography should begin when a woman is age 30-35 years. In contrast, all surveyed physicians recommended that a woman start undergoing mammography at age 40 years or older.
CONCLUSIONS: In this primary care setting, older women had poorer breast carcinoma knowledge than younger women but were equally likely to appreciate the benefits of mammography. Most women were unaware that age is a risk factor for breast carcinoma. Improved education of females by their physicians may resolve some of the observed discrepancies regarding the optimal age to begin screening mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9241075     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970801)80:3<413::aid-cncr9>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  Psychological and screening profiles of first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Miller; M A Diefenbach; L K Kruus; D Watkins-Bruner; G E Hanks; P F Engstrom
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-06

2.  Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Codori; Tracy Waldeck; Gloria M Petersen; Diana Miglioretti; Jill D Trimbath; Miriam A Tillery
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The effectiveness of a community-based breast cancer education intervention in the New York State Capital Region.

Authors:  Nur Zeinomar; Roxana Moslehi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Knowledge and accuracy of perceived personal risk in underserved women who are at increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mfon S Cyrus-David
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding breast cancer and screening in female teachers of buraidah, saudi arabia.

Authors:  Khadiga F Dandash; Abdurrahman Al-Mohaimeed
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2007-01

6.  Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  How old are African American women when they receive their first mammogram? Results from a church-based study.

Authors:  Janice V Bowie; Anita M Wells; Hee-Soon Juon; Kim D Sydnor; Elisa M Rodriguez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-08

8.  Perceived and objective breast cancer risk assessment in Chilean women living in an underserved area.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; Klaus Püschel; Javiera Martínez-Gutiérrez; Jennifer C Anderson; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in young breast cancer patients with and without genetic cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Phuong L Mai; Veronica I Lagos; Melanie R Palomares; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Perceived versus objective breast cancer risk in diverse women.

Authors:  Julia Fehniger; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah Karliner; Karla Kerlikowske; Jeffrey A Tice; Jessica Quinn; Elissa Ozanne; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.