Literature DB >> 12648249

Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography: a qualitative study.

Larissa Nekhlyudov1, Dennis Ross-Degnan, Suzanne W Fletcher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Because shared decision making has been recommended for screening mammography by women under age 50, we studied women's decision-making process regarding the procedure.
DESIGN: Qualitative research design using in-depth semi-structured interviews. PATIENTS: Sixteen white and African-American women aged 38 to 45 receiving care at a large New England medical practice.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified the following content areas in women's decision-making process: intentions for screening, motivating factors to undergo screening, attitudes toward screening mammography, attitudes toward breast cancer, and preferences for information and shared decision making. In our sample, all women had or intended to have a screening mammogram before age 50. They were motivated by the awareness of the recommendation to begin screening at age 40, knowing others with breast cancer, and a sense of personal responsibility for their health. Participants feared breast cancer and thought the benefits of screening mammography far outweighed its risks. Women's preferences for involvement in decision making varied from wanting full responsibility for screening decisions to deferring to their medical providers. All preferred the primary care provider to be the main source of information, yet the participants stated that their own providers played a limited role in educating them about the risks and benefits of screening and the mammography procedure itself. Most of their information was derived from the media.
CONCLUSIONS: The women in this study demonstrated little ambivalence in their desire for mammography screening prior to age 50. They reported minimal communication with their medical providers about the risks and benefits of screening. Better information flow regarding mammography screening is necessary. Given the lack of uncertainty among women's perceptions regarding screening mammography, shared decision making in this area may be difficult to achieve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12648249      PMCID: PMC1494837          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20112.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  26 in total

1.  Conflicting national recommendations and the use of screening mammography: does the physician's recommendation matter?

Authors:  S H Taplin; N Urban; V M Taylor; J Savarino
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

2.  Mammography controversies: time for informed consent?

Authors:  J P van Netten; S A Cann; J G Hall
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-08-06       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Mammography screening for women aged 40 through 49--a guidelines saga and a clarion call for informed decision making.

Authors:  V L Ernster
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  L F Degner; L J Kristjanson; D Bowman; J A Sloan; K C Carriere; J O'Neil; B Bilodeau; P Watson; B Mueller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Putting the "informed" in informed consent about mammography.

Authors:  B K Rimer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-05-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Predictors of interest in prostate-specific antigen screening and the impact of informed consent: what should we tell our patients?

Authors:  A M Wolf; J T Philbrick; J B Schorling
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Lessons from the mammography screening controversy: can we improve the debate?

Authors:  D F Ransohoff; R P Harris
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Age-related differences in breast carcinoma knowledge, beliefs, and perceived risk among women visiting an academic general medicine practice.

Authors:  N C Dolan; A M Lee; M M McDermott
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age.

Authors:  W C Black; R F Nease; A N Tosteson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-05-17       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  18 in total

1.  Predictors of perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: sociodemographic factors and mass media exposures.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Andrea C Dunlavy; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

2.  Effects of personal characteristics on African-American women's beliefs about breast cancer.

Authors:  Terrell W Zollinger; Victoria L Champion; Patrick O Monahan; Susan K Steele-Moses; Kim W Ziner; Qianqian Zhao; Sara A Bourff; Robert M Saywell; Kathleen M Russell
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

3.  Decision making and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Radhika A Ramanan; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006

5.  Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Carmen L Lewis; Michael P Pignone; Mick P Couper; Michael J Barry; Joann G Elmore; Carrie A Levin; John Van Hoewyk; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  A randomized trial of three videos that differ in the framing of information about mammography in women 40 to 49 years old.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Michael P Pignone; Stacey L Sheridan; Stephen M Downs; Linda S Kinsinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference?

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Rong Li; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  Women's Experiences of Inaccurate Breast Cancer Screening Results: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-07-01

9.  How old are African American women when they receive their first mammogram? Results from a church-based study.

Authors:  Janice V Bowie; Anita M Wells; Hee-Soon Juon; Kim D Sydnor; Elisa M Rodriguez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-08

10.  Approaches to preparing young scholars for careers in interdisciplinary team science.

Authors:  Melissa D Begg; Gene Crumley; Alecia M Fair; Camille A Martina; Wayne T McCormack; Carol Merchant; Cecilia M Patino-Sutton; Jason G Umans
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.