Literature DB >> 9240540

Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy.

R J Jackman1, F Burbank, S H Parker, W P Evans, M C Lechner, T R Richardson, I Tocino, A B Wray.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare histologic findings of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (hereafter, vacuum-assisted biopsy) and at 14-gauge, automated, large-core breast biopsy (hereafter, large-core biopsy) with findings at histologic examination after surgical biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonpalpable breast lesions were diagnosed as ADH at histologic examination after vacuum-assisted biopsy in 88 lesions in seven institutions and after large-core biopsy in 55 previously reported lesions. Histologic findings at subsequent surgical biopsy were compared for the presence of carcinoma.
RESULTS: On the basis of histologic findings of carcinoma at surgical biopsy, the diagnosis of ADH was not correct in 26 (48%) of 54 lesions sampled at large-core biopsy and in 13 (18%) of 74 lesions sampled at vacuum-assisted biopsy (Fisher exact test, P < .0004). More tissue specimens were obtained at vacuum-assisted biopsy (mean, 15.8 specimens) than at large-core biopsy (mean, 9.7 specimens). Individual specimens were twice as large at vacuum-assisted biopsy (mean, 34 mg) as at large-core biopsy (mean, 17 mg) (previously reported).
CONCLUSION: ADH was diagnosed 2.7 times more reliably at vacuum-assisted biopsy than at large-core biopsy (with no increase in complications) with most of the improvement as a result of acquisition of more than 10 specimens per lesion, but carcinoma was sufficiently underestimated with both methods to necessitate surgical biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9240540     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

1.  [Clip marker placement following MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast].

Authors:  C Perlet; H Sittek; M Reiser; S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Mammotome: less invasive than ABBI with similar accuracy for early breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Walter P Weber; Rosanna Zanetti; Igor Langer; Sophie Dellas; Markus Zuber; Holger Moch; Eugenia Remmel; Daniel Oertli; Edward Wight; Walter R Marti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: histological characterisation.

Authors:  T Perretta; C A Pistolese; F Bolacchi; E Cossu; V Fiaschetti; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Authors:  Y J Suh; M J Kim; E-K Kim; H J Moon; J Y Kwak; H R Koo; J H Yoon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Values of pathological analysis of lost tissue fragments in the vacuum canister during a vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  M El Khoury; B Mesurolle; A Omeroglu; A Aldis; E Kao
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institution.

Authors:  Gustavo Machado Badan; Decio Roveda Júnior; Sebastião Piato; Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury; Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos; Carlos Alberto Ferreira Pecci; Felipe Augusto Trocoli Ferreira; Camila D'Ávila
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Comparison of ductoscopy, galactography, and imaging modalities for the evaluation of intraductal lesions: a critical review.

Authors:  Ozgur Sarica; Enis Ozturk; Huseyin C Demirkurek; Fatih Uluc
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  A comparison of diagnostic performance of vacuum-assisted biopsy and core needle biopsy for breast microcalcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Chen Huang; Xu Hua Hu; Xiao Ran Wang; Chao Xi Zhou; Fei Fei Wang; Shan Yang; Gui Ying Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Randomized controlled trial of stereotactic 11-G vacuum-assisted core biopsy for the diagnosis and management of mammographic microcalcification.

Authors:  Sara M Bundred; Anthony J Maxwell; Julie Morris; Yit Y Lim; Md Janick Harake; Sigrid Whiteside; Nigel J Bundred
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Predictive factors for breast cancer in patients diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia at core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Byung Joo Chae; Ahwon Lee; Byung Joo Song; Sang Seol Jung
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.