Literature DB >> 9239549

Spine loading during trunk lateral bending motions.

W S Marras1, K P Granata.   

Abstract

Increases in lateral trunk velocities have been identified as a mechanism for increasing the risk of low-back disorder. Previous studies have identified an increase in coactivation of the trunk musculature during lateral bends, but no studies have evaluated how spine loading changes as lateral trunk velocity increases. Twelve subjects were asked to lift loads laterally at one static and three dynamic velocities. Ten trunk muscle activities and trunk kinematics were documented and used as input parameters to an EMG-assisted model to evaluate spine loading. Muscle coactivation was observed in all lateral bends. Coactivation significantly increased during dynamic trials compared to the static trials. Coactivity increased spinal loads by as much as 25% compared to values predicted by models that did not consider coactivity. Movements to the right significantly increased spine loadings (252 N increase in compression) compared to movements to the left. Spine compression, A-P shear, and lateral shear all increased in the dynamic trials compared to the static conditions. Peak compression increased by an average of 525 N at 45 degrees s-1 compared to static loading. Compression and lateral shear increased monotonically as trunk velocity increased. It is expected that this combined (compression and lateral shear) loading is the mechanism for increased risk observed in industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9239549     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00010-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  11 in total

1.  Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.

Authors:  P J Lee; K P Granata
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Architectural analysis and predicted functional capability of the human latissimus dorsi muscle.

Authors:  Michael E Gerling; Stephen H M Brown
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.

Authors:  Gregory G Knapik; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Musculoskeletal disorder risk during automotive assembly: current vs. seated.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; W Gary Allread; Gregory G Knapik; Riley E Splittstoesser
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Biomechanical factors during common agricultural activities: Results of on-farm exposure assessments using direct measurement methods.

Authors:  Nathan B Fethke; Mark C Schall; Howard Chen; Cassidy A Branch; Linda A Merlino
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Neuromuscular Evaluation of Trunk-Training Exercises.

Authors:  Peter Konrad; Klaus Schmitz; Achim Denner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Hip rotation range of motion in people with and without low back pain who participate in rotation-related sports.

Authors:  Linda R Van Dillen; Nancy J Bloom; Sara P Gombatto; Thomas M Susco
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Trunk antagonist co-activation is associated with impaired neuromuscular performance.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Jacek Cholewicki; Theodore Milner; Angela S Lee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Biomechanical analysis of INFINITY rehabilitation method for treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  Matej Daniel; Michaela Tomanová; Jana Hornová; Iva Novotná; Lenka Lhotská
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-05-16

10.  A Promising Wearable Solution for the Practical and Accurate Monitoring of Low Back Loading in Manual Material Handling.

Authors:  Emily S Matijevich; Peter Volgyesi; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.