Literature DB >> 32069181

Biomechanical factors during common agricultural activities: Results of on-farm exposure assessments using direct measurement methods.

Nathan B Fethke1, Mark C Schall2, Howard Chen3, Cassidy A Branch4, Linda A Merlino1.   

Abstract

Agricultural work is associated with increased risk of adverse musculoskeletal health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to quantify exposure to biomechanical factors among a sample (n = 55) of farmers in the Midwest region of the U.S. while they performed a variety of routine agricultural activities, and to compare exposure levels between these activities. Surface electromyography was used to estimate activity levels of the erector spinae, upper trapezius, forearm flexor, and forearm extensor muscle groups. Simultaneously, inertial sensors were used to measure kinematics of the trunk, upper arm, and wrist. In general, lower muscle activity levels, less extreme postures, and slower movement speeds were observed during activities that involved primarily the use of agricultural machinery in comparison to manual activities, suggesting a potential advantage of mechanization relative to musculoskeletal health. Median wrist movement speeds exceeding recently proposed exposure thresholds were also observed during many manual activities, such as milking animals and repairing equipment. Upper arm postures and movement speeds did not appear to confer excessive risk for shoulder-related outcomes (on the whole), but interpretation of the results is limited by a sampling approach that may not have captured the full extent of exposure variation. Not surprisingly, substantial variation in exposure levels were observed within each agricultural activity, which is related to substantial variation in the equipment, tools, and work practices used by participants. Ultimately, the results of this study contribute to an emerging literature in which the physical demands of routine agricultural work have been described on the basis of sensor-based measurements rather than more common self-report or observation-based approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; ergonomics; kinematics; surface electromyography

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32069181      PMCID: PMC8256625          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1717502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  74 in total

1.  Evaluation of a personal device in reducing the risk of low back disorders during stooped work.

Authors:  Brent L Ulrey; Fadi A Fathallah
Journal:  Work       Date:  2012

2.  Normalization of surface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies - A review.

Authors:  S E Mathiassen; J Winkel; G M Hägg
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Trapezius muscle rest time during standardised computer work--a comparison of female computer users with and without self-reported neck/shoulder complaints.

Authors:  S Thorn; K Søgaard; L A C Kallenberg; L Sandsjö; G Sjøgaard; H J Hermens; R Kadefors; M Forsman
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  A population based survey of ergonomic risk factors in Connecticut: distribution by industry, occupation, and demographics.

Authors:  Tim F Morse; Nicholas Warren; Charles Dillon; Ulysses Diva
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  2007-05

Review 5.  Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Bruno R da Costa; Edgar Ramos Vieira
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Whole-Body Vibration and Trunk Posture During Operation of Agricultural Machinery.

Authors:  Nathan B Fethke; Mark C Schall; Linda A Merlino; Howard Chen; Cassidy A Branch; Maya Ramaswamy
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.179

7.  Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among agricultural workers in the United States: an analysis of the National Health Interview Survey, 2004-2008.

Authors:  Soo-Jeong Lee; Sangwoo Tak; Toni Alterman; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  J Agromedicine       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Electromyographic assessment of apple bucket intervention designed to reduce back strain.

Authors:  Giulia Earle-Richardson; Paul L Jenkins; David Strogatz; Erin M Bell; Andris Freivalds; Julie A Sorensen; John J May
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Effect of a novel teat preparation system on upper extremity muscle activity among U.S. large-herd dairy parlor workers.

Authors:  David I Douphrate; Nathan B Fethke; Matthew W Nonnenmann; Anabel Rodriguez; Robert Hagevoort; David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  Trunk kinematics and low back pain during pruning among vineyard workers-A field study at the Chateau Larose-Trintaudon.

Authors:  Romain Balaguier; Pascal Madeleine; Kévin Rose-Dulcina; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ergonomic Improvements to Agricultural Harvest Baskets to Reduce the Risk of Musculoskeletal Disorders among Farmers.

Authors:  Mintae Seo; Hyocher Kim; Wongeon Jung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.