Literature DB >> 9236122

Quantitation of the inhibition of Hfr x F- recombination by the mutagenesis complex UmuD'C.

F Boudsocq1, M Campbell, R Devoret, A Bailone.   

Abstract

The UmuD'C complex and RecA protein are two essential components in mutagenic repair of gaps produced by the replication of damaged DNA. In this process, the UmuD'C complex might help DNA polymerase to synthesize DNA across a lesion. Besides, a RecA polymer wrapping around single-stranded DNA could function as a directional chaperone to target the UmuD'C complex at the lesion. It was shown in our laboratory that the UmuD'C complex prevents homologous recombination and recombinational repair when expressed at elevated levels. To find out whether the UmuD'C complex inhibits recombination by interfering directly with RecA, we measured the kinetics of inhibition of Hfr x F- recombination in F- recipients in which either RecA or UmuD'C were made to vary. The cell concentrations of RecA and UmuD'C proteins were adjusted by having the recA and the umuD'C genes regulated by the arabinose P(BAD) promoter. In the absence of the UmuD'C complex, recombination was a function of RecA concentration and then reached a plateau when the RecA concentration was above 9000 monomers/cell. At a fixed RecA concentration, the yield of Hfr x F- recombinants decreased as a function of the UmuD'C cell concentration. At a given UmuD'C/RecA ratio, recombination inhibition by UmuD'C was reversed by increasing the RecA cell concentration. RecA1730, a mutant protein impaired in the chaperone activity, was insensitive to UmuD'C inhibition. We propose a model accounting for the RecA chaperone function in SOS mutagenesis and for the UmuD'C inhibitory effect on homologous recombination. We suggest that the UmuD'C complex is placed at the tip of a RecA polymer as a result of a treadmilling process. This would position the UmuD'C complex right at a lesion while the capping by UmuD'C would destabilize a RecA polymer and thereby abort the recombination process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9236122     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  32 in total

Review 1.  Roles of DNA polymerases V and II in SOS-induced error-prone and error-free repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P Pham; S Rangarajan; R Woodgate; M F Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Managing DNA polymerases: coordinating DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA recombination.

Authors:  M D Sutton; G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Converting a DNA damage checkpoint effector (UmuD2C) into a lesion bypass polymerase (UmuD'2C).

Authors:  A E Ferentz; G C Walker; G Wagner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Two distinct modes of RecA action are required for DNA polymerase V-catalyzed translesion synthesis.

Authors:  Phuong Pham; Erica M Seitz; Sergei Saveliev; Xuan Shen; Roger Woodgate; Michael M Cox; Myron F Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  A new model for SOS-induced mutagenesis: how RecA protein activates DNA polymerase V.

Authors:  Meghna Patel; Qingfei Jiang; Roger Woodgate; Michael M Cox; Myron F Goodman
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.250

6.  Translesion DNA polymerases are required for spontaneous deletion formation in Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  Sanna Koskiniemi; Dan I Andersson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  RecA and RadA proteins of Brucella abortus do not perform overlapping protective DNA repair functions following oxidative burst.

Authors:  Christelle M Roux; Natha J Booth; Bryan H Bellaire; Jason M Gee; R Martin Roop; Michael E Kovach; Renée M Tsolis; Philip H Elzer; Don G Ennis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The beta subunit sliding DNA clamp is responsible for unassisted mutagenic translesion replication by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme.

Authors:  G Tomer; N B Reuven; Z Livneh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Inhibition of homologous recombination by the plasmid MucA'B complex.

Authors:  C Venderbure; A Chastanet; F Boudsocq; S Sommer; A Bailone
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Interplay between replication and recombination in Escherichia coli: impact of the alternative DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Stéphane Delmas; Ivan Matic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.