Literature DB >> 9234738

Two evolutionarily conserved repression domains in the Drosophila Kruppel protein differ in activator specificity.

W Hanna-Rose1, J D Licht, U Hansen.   

Abstract

To identify biologically functional regions in the product of the Drosophila melanogaster gene Kruppel, we cloned the Kruppel homolog from Drosophila virilis. Both the previously identified amino (N)-terminal repression region and the DNA-binding region of the D. virilis Kruppel protein are greater than 96% identical to those of the D. melanogaster Kruppel protein, demonstrating a selective pressure to maintain the integrity of each region during 60 million to 80 million years of evolution. An additional region in the carboxyl (C) terminus of Kruppel that was most highly conserved was examined further. A 42-amino-acid stretch within the conserved C-terminal region also encoded a transferable repression domain. The short, C-terminal repression region is a composite of three subregions of distinct amino acid composition, each containing a high proportion of either basic, proline, or acidic residues. Mutagenesis experiments demonstrated, unexpectedly, that the acidic residues contribute to repression function. Both the N-terminal and C-terminal repression regions were tested for the ability to affect transcription mediated by a variety of activator proteins. The N-terminal repression region was able to inhibit transcription in the presence of multiple activators. However, the C-terminal repression region inhibited transcription by only a subset of the activator proteins. The different activator specificities of the two regions suggest that they repress transcription by different mechanisms and may play distinct biological roles during Drosophila development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9234738      PMCID: PMC232334          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.17.8.4820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  55 in total

1.  lac repressor can regulate expression from a hybrid SV40 early promoter containing a lac operator in animal cells.

Authors:  M Brown; J Figge; U Hansen; C Wright; K T Jeang; G Khoury; D M Livingston; T M Roberts
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  CAT constructions with multiple unique restriction sites for the functional analysis of eukaryotic promoters and regulatory elements.

Authors:  B Luckow; G Schütz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-07-10       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Functional dissection of VP16, the trans-activator of herpes simplex virus immediate early gene expression.

Authors:  S J Triezenberg; R C Kingsbury; S L McKnight
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Transcription in yeast activated by a putative amphipathic alpha helix linked to a DNA binding unit.

Authors:  E Giniger; M Ptashne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Dec 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  GAL4 activates gene expression in mammalian cells.

Authors:  H Kakidani; M Ptashne
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-01-29       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Evolutionary divergence of promoters and spacers in the rDNA family of four Drosophila species. Implications for molecular coevolution in multigene families.

Authors:  D Tautz; C Tautz; D Webb; G A Dover
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Sequence-specific DNA-binding activities of the gap proteins encoded by hunchback and Krüppel in Drosophila.

Authors:  D Stanojević; T Hoey; M Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Stringent regulation of stably integrated chloramphenicol acetyl transferase genes by E. coli lac repressor in monkey cells.

Authors:  J Figge; C Wright; C J Collins; T M Roberts; D M Livingston
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-03-11       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Coding sequence and expression of the homeobox gene Hox 1.3.

Authors:  M Fibi; B Zink; M Kessel; A M Colberg-Poley; S Labeit; H Lehrach; P Gruss
Journal:  Development       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Comparison of the gap segmentation gene hunchback between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis reveals novel modes of evolutionary change.

Authors:  M Treier; C Pfeifle; D Tautz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  10 in total

1.  Independent repressor domains in ZEB regulate muscle and T-cell differentiation.

Authors:  A A Postigo; D C Dean
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  EVOPRINTER, a multigenomic comparative tool for rapid identification of functionally important DNA.

Authors:  Ward F Odenwald; Wayne Rasband; Alexander Kuzin; Thomas Brody
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Krüppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Y Nibu; H Zhang; E Bajor; S Barolo; S Small; M Levine
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors.

Authors:  J R Ryu; L K Olson; D N Arnosti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The functions of the multiproduct and rapidly evolving dec-1 eggshell gene are conserved between evolutionarily distant species of Drosophila.

Authors:  J C Badciong; J M Otto; G L Waring
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Net, a negative Ras-switchable TCF, contains a second inhibition domain, the CID, that mediates repression through interactions with CtBP and de-acetylation.

Authors:  P Criqui-Filipe; C Ducret; S M Maira; B Wasylyk
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  dCtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of the Drosophila Knirps protein.

Authors:  S A Keller; Y Mao; P Struffi; C Margulies; C E Yurk; A R Anderson; R L Amey; S Moore; J M Ebels; K Foley; M Corado; D N Arnosti
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Transcription repression by Xenopus ET and its human ortholog TBX3, a gene involved in ulnar-mammary syndrome.

Authors:  M l He; L Wen; C E Campbell; J Y Wu; Y Rao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Kruppel-like factor 15, a zinc-finger transcriptional regulator, represses the rhodopsin and interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein promoters.

Authors:  Deborah C Otteson; Yuhui Liu; Hong Lai; ChenWei Wang; Susan Gray; Mukesh K Jain; Donald J Zack
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Tobacco transcription factors: novel insights into transcriptional regulation in the Solanaceae.

Authors:  Paul J Rushton; Marta T Bokowiec; Shengcheng Han; Hongbo Zhang; Jennifer F Brannock; Xianfeng Chen; Thomas W Laudeman; Michael P Timko
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 8.340

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.