Literature DB >> 11687630

Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors.

J R Ryu1, L K Olson, D N Arnosti.   

Abstract

Transcriptional repressors can be classified as short- or long-range, according to their range of activity. Functional analysis of identified short-range repressors has been carried out largely in transgenic Drosophila, but it is not known whether general properties of short-range repressors are evident in other types of assays. To study short-range transcriptional repressors in cultured cells, we created chimeric tetracycline repressors based on Drosophila transcriptional repressors Giant, Drosophila C-terminal-binding protein (dCtBP), and Knirps. We find that Giant and dCtBP are efficient repressors in Drosophila and mammalian cells, whereas Knirps is active only in insect cells. The restricted activity of Knirps, in contrast to that of Giant, suggests that not all short-range repressors possess identical activities, consistent with recent findings showing that short-range repressors act through multiple pathways. The mammalian repressor Kid is more effective than either Giant or dCtBP in mammalian cells but is inactive in Drosophila cells. These results indicate that species-specific factors are important for the function of the Knirps and Kid repressors. Giant and dCtBP repress reporter genes in a variety of contexts, including genes that were introduced by transient transfection, carried on episomal elements, or stably integrated. This broad activity indicates that the context of the target gene is not critical for the ability of short-range repressors to block transcription, in contrast to other repressors that act only on stably integrated genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687630      PMCID: PMC60807          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.231394998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  49 in total

1.  Tetracycline-inducible expression systems with reduced basal activity in mammalian cells.

Authors:  K Forster; V Helbl; T Lederer; S Urlinger; N Wittenburg; W Hillen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Krüppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Y Nibu; H Zhang; E Bajor; S Barolo; S Small; M Levine
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Generation of conditional mutants in higher eukaryotes by switching between the expression of two genes.

Authors:  U Baron; D Schnappinger; V Helbl; M Gossen; W Hillen; H Bujard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Groucho and dCtBP mediate separate pathways of transcriptional repression in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  H Zhang; M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  An activator/repressor dual system allows tight tetracycline-regulated gene expression in budding yeast.

Authors:  G Bellí; E Garí; L Piedrafita; M Aldea; E Herrero
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Two distinct types of repression domain in engrailed: one interacts with the groucho corepressor and is preferentially active on integrated target genes.

Authors:  E N Tolkunova; M Fujioka; M Kobayashi; D Deka; J B Jaynes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Spatial and temporal targeting of gene expression in Drosophila by means of a tetracycline-dependent transactivator system.

Authors:  B Bello; D Resendez-Perez; W J Gehring
Journal:  Development       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation.

Authors:  U Schaeper; J M Boyd; S Verma; E Uhlmann; T Subramanian; G Chinnadurai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Tet B or not tet B: advances in tetracycline-inducible gene expression.

Authors:  H M Blau; F M Rossi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient.

Authors:  G F Hewitt; B S Strunk; C Margulies; T Priputin; X D Wang; R Amey; B A Pabst; D Kosman; J Reinitz; D N Arnosti
Journal:  Development       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  6 in total

1.  Functional similarity of Knirps CtBP-dependent and CtBP-independent transcriptional repressor activities.

Authors:  Jae-Ryeon Ryu; David N Arnosti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  cis-regulatory logic of short-range transcriptional repression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Meghana M Kulkarni; David N Arnosti
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  The TetR family of transcriptional repressors.

Authors:  Juan L Ramos; Manuel Martínez-Bueno; Antonio J Molina-Henares; Wilson Terán; Kazuya Watanabe; Xiaodong Zhang; María Trinidad Gallegos; Richard Brennan; Raquel Tobes
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  The gap gene network.

Authors:  Johannes Jaeger
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  A positive readout single transcript reporter for site-specific mRNA cleavage.

Authors:  Nikolay Kandul; Ming Guo; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Tetracycline regulated systems in functional oncogenomics.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Welman; Jane Barraclough; Caroline Dive
Journal:  Transl Oncogenomics       Date:  2007-03-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.