Literature DB >> 3116264

Evolutionary divergence of promoters and spacers in the rDNA family of four Drosophila species. Implications for molecular coevolution in multigene families.

D Tautz1, C Tautz, D Webb, G A Dover.   

Abstract

The organization and sequence of the rDNA multigene family of four Drosophila species (melanogaster, orena, virilis and hydei) have been compared in order to understand the quality and quantity of the differences which are involved with interspecific divergence of promoters and the polymerase I complexes (molecular coevolution). Each species has an intergenic spacer (IGS) made up of subrepeats which contain duplications of the promoter. Major structural and point-mutational differences exist, most of which have been spread by unequal crossingover through the family and species. Structural differences involve the types, lengths and copy-number of the IGS subrepeats, and the lengths and position of "unique" regions between blocks of repeats. The 240 base-pair repeat array shared by D. melanogaster and D. orena has been replaced by a 220 base-pair repeat, and the 95 and 330 base-pair arrays are absent altogether in D. virilis and D. hydei. The length of the "unique" region between the 240/220 base-pair arrays and the start of transcription varies, with the unusual situation of the last of the 220 repeats ending at the external transcribed spacer (ETS) boundary in D. virilis. Other structural differences involve regions of high cryptic simplicity arising from slippage in D. virilis and D. hydei IGSs. Sequence analysis of IGS and the ETSs indicates that the rDNA is not uniformly divergent throughout its length. Apart from the genes, there are regions of relatively high conservation covering the promoter regions and at some but not all potential RNA processing sites. The conserved promoter regions are more extensive within each pair of species D. melanogaster versus D. orena and D. virilis versus D. hydei, in keeping with their phylogenetic distances. Slippage-like mechanisms are involved with large numbers of deletions/insertions that make up the ETS differences between the species. Patterns of shared mutations between IGS subrepeats indicate stages of transition during rDNA differentiation by continual homogenization. The simultaneous operation of different turnover mechanisms, at different periodicities and rates, generates a complex picture of reorganization, some of which would influence the process of molecular coevolution in the family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3116264     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90181-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  43 in total

1.  Intraspecific diversity of the 23S rRNA gene and the spacer region downstream in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A I Antón; A J Martínez-Murcia; F Rodríguez-Valera
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Is higher-order structure conserved in eukaryotic ribosomal DNA intergenic spacers?

Authors:  G D Baldridge; M W Dalton; A M Fallon
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  rRNA genes from the lower chordate Herdmania momus: structural similarity with higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  B M Degnan; J Yan; C J Hawkins; M F Lavin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Spacer promoters are orientation-dependent activators of pre-rRNA transcription in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; P Fiorentini; P P Di Nocera
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Minos, a new transposable element from Drosophila hydei, is a member of the Tc1-like family of transposons.

Authors:  G Franz; C Savakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Sequence variation within the rRNA gene loci of 12 Drosophila species.

Authors:  Deborah E Stage; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) in Calyptratae (Diptera: Brachycera).

Authors:  Zhong-kui Song; Xun-zhang Wang; Ge-qiu Liang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Multigene family of ribosomal DNA in Drosophila melanogaster reveals contrasting patterns of homogenization for IGS and ITS spacer regions. A possible mechanism to resolve this paradox.

Authors:  C Polanco; A I González; G A Dover
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Nuclear ribosomal spacer regions in plant phylogenetics: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Péter Poczai; Jaakko Hyvönen
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  Repetitive sequence variation and dynamics in the ribosomal DNA array of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as revealed by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Stephen A James; Michael J T O'Kelly; David M Carter; Robert P Davey; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Ian N Roberts
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.