Literature DB >> 9231922

Comparison of radiobiological effective depths in 65-MeV modulated proton beams.

J T Tang1, T Inoue, T Inoue, H Yamazaki, S Fukushima, N Fournier-Bidoz, M Koizumi, S Ozeki, K Hatanaka.   

Abstract

To assess the achievement of uniformity of radiobiological effectiveness at different depths in the proton spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to 65-MeV modulated proton beams at the Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP) of Osaka University. We selected four different irradiation positions: 2 mm depth, corresponding to the entrance, and 10, 18 and 23 mm depths, corresponding to different positions in the SOBP. Cell survival curves were generated with the in vitro colony formation method and fitted to the linear-quadratic model. With 137Cs gamma-rays as the reference irradiation, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for a surviving fraction (SF) level of 0.1 are 1.05, 1.10, 1.12 and 1.19 for depths of 2, 10, 18 and 23 mm respectively. A significant difference was found between the survival curves at 10 and 23 mm (P < 0.05), but not between 18 and 10 mm or between 18 and 23 mm. There was a significant dependence of RBE on depths in modulated proton beams at the 0.1 surviving fraction level (P < 0.05). Moreover, the rise of RBEs significantly depended on increasing SF level or decreased approximately in correspondence with irradiation dose (P = 0.0001). To maintain uniformity of radiobiological effectiveness for the target volume, careful attention should be paid to the influence of depth of beam and irradiation dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9231922      PMCID: PMC2223949          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

1.  Mutation induction and RBE-LET relationship of low-energy protons in V79 cells.

Authors:  M Belli; F Cera; R Cherubini; F Ianzini; G Moschini; O Sapora; G Simone; M A Tabocchini; P Tiveron
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 2.  Biological effectiveness of high-energy protons: target fragmentation.

Authors:  F A Cucinotta; R Katz; J W Wilson; L W Townsend; J Shinn; F Hajnal
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  The irradiation of V79 mammalian cells by protons with energies below 2 MeV. Part I: Experimental arrangement and measurements of cell survival.

Authors:  M Folkard; K M Prise; B Vojnovic; S Davies; M J Roper; B D Michael
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  RBE-LET relationship for the survival of V79 cells irradiated with low energy protons.

Authors:  M Belli; R Cherubini; S Finotto; G Moschini; O Sapora; G Simone; M A Tabocchini
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy?

Authors:  B J Mijnheer; J J Battermann; A Wambersie
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Particle radiotherapy: historical developments and current status.

Authors:  M R Raju
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Radiobiological studies of a high-energy modulated proton beam utilizing cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  J B Robertson; J R Williams; R A Schmidt; J B Little; D F Flynn; H D Suit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Relative biological effectiveness of a high energy modulated proton beam using a spontaneous murine tumor in vivo.

Authors:  M Urano; M Goitein; L Verhey; O Mendiondo; H D Suit; A Koehler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Proton beams in radiation therapy.

Authors:  H Suit; M Urie
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-02-05       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  The irradiation of V79 mammalian cells by protons with energies below 2 MeV. Part II. Measurement of oxygen enhancement ratios and DNA damage.

Authors:  K M Prise; M Folkard; S Davies; B D Michael
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.694

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Combined Treatment Modalities for High-Energy Proton Irradiation: Exploiting Specific DNA Repair Dependencies.

Authors:  Simon Deycmar; Martin Pruschy
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

2.  Relative biological effectiveness of the 60-MeV therapeutic proton beam at the Institute of Nuclear Physics (IFJ PAN) in Kraków, Poland.

Authors:  Dorota Słonina; Beata Biesaga; Jan Swakoń; Damian Kabat; Leszek Grzanka; Marta Ptaszkiewicz; Urszula Sowa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness - Uncertainties and Opportunities.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

4.  Investigating Dependencies of Relative Biological Effectiveness for Proton Therapy in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Michelle E Howard; Chris Beltran; Sarah Anderson; Wan Chan Tseung; Jann N Sarkaria; Michael G Herman
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-03-21

Review 5.  Proton radiobiology.

Authors:  Francesco Tommasino; Marco Durante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: a comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and 137Cs.

Authors:  Michelle Howard; Chris Beltran; Jann Sarkaria; Michael G Herman
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  A model for relative biological effectiveness of therapeutic proton beams based on a global fit of cell survival data.

Authors:  Ramin Abolfath; Christopher R Peeler; Mark Newpower; Lawrence Bronk; David Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  The 20th Gray lecture 2019: health and heavy ions.

Authors:  Eleanor A Blakely
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  New insights in the relative radiobiological effectiveness of proton irradiation.

Authors:  K Ilicic; S E Combs; T E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.