Literature DB >> 25037857

Relative biological effectiveness of the 60-MeV therapeutic proton beam at the Institute of Nuclear Physics (IFJ PAN) in Kraków, Poland.

Dorota Słonina1, Beata Biesaga, Jan Swakoń, Damian Kabat, Leszek Grzanka, Marta Ptaszkiewicz, Urszula Sowa.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of a 60-MeV proton radiotherapy beam at the Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences (IFJ PAN) in Kraków, the first one to operate in Poland. RBE was assessed at the surviving fractions (SFs) of 0.01, 0.1, and 0.37, for normal human fibroblasts from three cancer patients. The cells were irradiated near the Bragg peak of the pristine beam and at three depths within a 28.4-mm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). Reference radiation was provided by 6-MV X-rays. The mean RBE value at SF = 0.01 for fibroblasts irradiated near the Bragg peak of pristine beam ranged between 1.06 and 1.15. The mean RBE values at SF = 0.01 for these cells exposed at depths of 2, 15, and 27 mm of the SOBP ranged between 0.95-1.00, 0.97-1.02, and 1.05-1.11, respectively. A trend was observed for RBE values to increase with survival level and with depth in the SOBP: at SF = 0.37 and at the depth of 27 mm, RBE values attained their maximum (1.19-1.24). The RBE values estimated at SF = 0.01 using normal human fibroblasts for the 60-MeV proton radiotherapy beam at the IFJ PAN in Kraków are close to values of 1.0 and 1.1, used in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25037857      PMCID: PMC4220900          DOI: 10.1007/s00411-014-0559-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  24 in total

1.  Radiobiological significance of beamline dependent proton energy distributions in a spread-out Bragg peak.

Authors:  H Paganetti; M Goitein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiobiological characterization of two therapeutic proton beams with different initial energy spectra used at the Institut Curie Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.

Authors:  Valentin Calugaru; Catherine Nauraye; Georges Noël; Nicole Giocanti; Vincent Favaudon; Frédérique Mégnin-Chanet
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Measurements of relative biological effectiveness of the 70 MeV proton beam at TRIUMF using Chinese hamster V79 cells and the high-precision cell sorter assay.

Authors:  B G Wouters; G K Lam; U Oelfke; K Gardey; R E Durand; L D Skarsgard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Variations in the RBE for cell killing along the depth-dose profile of a modulated proton therapy beam.

Authors:  Richard A Britten; Vahagn Nazaryan; Leslie K Davis; Susan B Klein; Dmitri Nichiporov; Marc S Mendonca; Mark Wolanski; Xiliang Nie; Jerry George; Cynthia Keppel
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Impact of variable RBE on proton fractionation.

Authors:  Alexandru Dasu; Iuliana Toma-Dasu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Relative biological effectiveness of proton medical beam at Moscow synchrotron determined by the Chinese hamster cells assay.

Authors:  P N Yashkin; D I Silin; V A Zolotov; V I Kostjuchenko; D F Nichiporov; T P Feoktistova; K S Martirosov; Y I Minakova; V S Khoroshkov; P B Polonski
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Relative biological effectiveness of intermediate energy protons. Comparisons with 60Co gamma-radiation using two cell lines.

Authors:  E Blomquist; K R Russell; B Stenerlöw; A Montelius; E Grusell; J Carlsson
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Variations in linear energy transfer within clinical proton therapy fields and the potential for biological treatment planning.

Authors:  Clemens Grassberger; Alexei Trofimov; Anthony Lomax; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Preclinical biological assessment of proton and carbon ion beams at Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center.

Authors:  Kazufumi Kagawa; Masao Murakami; Yoshio Hishikawa; Mitsuyuki Abe; Takashi Akagi; Toshihiro Yanou; Go Kagiya; Yoshiya Furusawa; Koichi Ando; Kumie Nojima; Mizuho Aoki; Tatsuaki Kanai
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Low-dose radiation response of primary keratinocytes and fibroblasts from patients with cervix cancer.

Authors:  Dorota Słonina; Beata Biesaga; Krzysztof Urbański; Zbigniew Kojs
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs.

Authors:  C von Neubeck; A Seidlitz; H H Kitzler; B Beuthien-Baumann; M Krause
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Do protons and X-rays induce cell-killing in human peripheral blood lymphocytes by different mechanisms?

Authors:  J Miszczyk; K Rawojć; A Panek; A Borkowska; P G S Prasanna; M M Ahmed; J Swakoń; A Gałaś
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 3.  Relative biological effectiveness in proton beam therapy - Current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  Armin Lühr; Cläre von Neubeck; Mechthild Krause; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.