Literature DB >> 29318437

Replication of a Controlled Community Prevention Trial: Results From a Local Implementation of Science-Based Intervention to Reduce Impaired Driving.

Michael D George1, Harold D Holder2, Paul N McKenzie3, Heather R Mueller4, Donna C Herchek5, Barry S Faile6.   

Abstract

We tested the generalizability of a science-based community prevention design to reduce DUI crashes. Previous researcher-led studies have confirmed the effects of an intervention design of visible enforcement coupled with heightened public awareness of enforcement to increase driver perception of likely detection for drinking and driving. A community coalition based the project on a prevention intervention model that included two key intermediate variables: levels of visible enforcement and of public awareness of enforcement. We evaluated the project using community-specific monthly time-series measures of DUI crashes and state level trends in DUI crashes, indicators of enforcement, and public attention to enforcement. We devised the evaluation design to determine if an observed trend in DUI crashes declined and to verify if key intermediate variables increased, as stimulated by local efforts. DUI crash analysis documented an upward trend during a pre-trial period from July 2010-December 2011, which matched the upward trend in state DUI crashes. After the local intervention began in January 2012, local DUI crashes began a clear downward trend (average 2013 crashes were 23% lower than in 2012 and a 5-month post-intervention average from 2013 was lower than the equivalent 5-month pre-intervention average). This contrasted with the continued upward state DUI crash trend, with a 2-year increase of 16%. The downward trend in local crashes was associated with an increase in DUI enforcement as well as news stories concerning DUI enforcement that were stimulated by the efforts of the community prevention project. These results confirm the generalizability of two previous community research trials that were conducted with limited or no research resources or leadership. We discuss the importance of controlling for external factors in attributing causation in a local prevention evaluation by confirming both sufficient local prevention efforts and a decline in DUI crashes.

Keywords:  Alcohol-involved traffic crashes; Community action prevention; DUI enforcement; Drinking and driving; High visible enforcement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29318437     DOI: 10.1007/s10935-017-0499-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Prev        ISSN: 0278-095X


  11 in total

1.  Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol (CMCA): effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes.

Authors:  A C Wagenaar; D M Murray; T L Toomey
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Phases of alcohol problem prevention research.

Authors:  H Holder; B Flay; J Howard; G Boyd; R Voas; M Grossman
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries.

Authors:  H D Holder; P J Gruenewald; W R Ponicki; A J Treno; J W Grube; R F Saltz; R B Voas; R Reynolds; J Davis; L Sanchez; G Gaumont; P Roeper
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-08       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Evaluation of media advocacy efforts within a community trial to reduce alcohol-involved injury. Preliminary newspaper results.

Authors:  A J Treno; L Breed; H D Holder; P Roeper; B A Thomas; P J Gruenewald
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  1996-08

Review 5.  Sobriety checkpoints: evidence of effectiveness is strong, but use is limited.

Authors:  James C Fell; John H Lacey; Robert B Voas
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.491

6.  Drinking and driving prevention in the community: program planning and implementation.

Authors:  R B Voas
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  The effect of drinking and driving interventions on alcohol-involved traffic crashes within a comprehensive community trial.

Authors:  R B Voas; H D Holder; P J Gruenewald
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Deterring the drinking driver: the Stockton experience.

Authors:  R B Voas; J M Hause
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1987-04

9.  Drivers' differential perceptions of legal and safe driving consumption.

Authors:  I P Albery; A Guppy
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 10.  Preventing impaired driving opportunities and problems.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; James C Fell
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.